FAMILY
REMINISCENCES
By
Of
Trenton, Tenn.
St. Louis
1894
This book was transcribed by . Every effort was made to be accurate and true to the original.
I am searching the BOYKIN, JONES, COBB and a second JONES families of Gibson County.
Index of Surnames that appear in the book:
Askew | Harris | Porter |
Barksdale | Haskell | Randolph |
Bell | Helm | Raulston |
Black | Henry | Read |
Boyd | Herron | Reed |
Brown | Hill | Reese |
Bryant | Hillsman | Robertson |
Burrow | Holmes | Simmons |
Cardwell | Hurt | Smith |
Carrington | Hutcherson | Taliaferro |
Carson | Jackson | Tinsley |
Charles | Jeter | Tinsly |
Clark | Jones | Totton |
Clopton | Keer | Tsin |
Coats | Kelton | Wilson |
Collins | Levy | Wingo |
Craven | Marshall | Witt |
Dinwiddie | McAlister | Wray |
Drake | McDearmon | Wright |
Dyzart | McLary | Wyatt |
Gallion | O'Conner | |
Graves | Palmer | |
Happel | Perviance | |
Pleasant |
PREFACE
My
son Silas some years ago requested me to write a sketch of our family, before
the facts known to me should pass away with me and be forgotten.
I at first thought of confining myself almost exclusively to genealogy;
but I have departed from that idea to some extent, as will be seen.
I have said little, if anything, of living, or of those facts known to my
children, or as accessible to them as to me.
I have, since my health gave way, frequently regretted that I did not,
during the lives of my mother and my maternal grandmother, write out and
preserve the more prominent facts of our family history, especially those
relating to our Huguenot ancestry. I
could forty years ago, no doubt, have carried the history of my wife’s family
back a generation or two further. I
could probably have learned from Col. Woods when his great grandmother Woods
came from Ireland to North Carolina; and from my wife’s maternal grandfather,
when his ancestors came to this country. But
forty years ago I did not feel any particular interest in collecting and
preserving these facts for my children. My
wife had the family Bible in which the record of her father’s family was kept.
When she got the Bible, after her father’s death, it had gone pretty
much to pieces. There is an
impression in the family that, some years before her death, she took out the
leaves containing this record, and gave them to her brother Levi for safe
keeping. Levi, I understand, is of
the same impression; but, if the record was placed in his hands, he has mislaid
it. My sister gave our own family
record, some years ago, to her brother Isaac, but he seems to have mislaid it.
This will account for the omission of some dates as to births and deaths,
that would otherwise be expected.
Most of the time I have been unable to write, and
when able to do so, could write only a little at a time.
Signed
L. M. JONES
TRENTON, Tenn., 1891
Family
Reminiscences
The writer of the following paper was born in Halifax
County, Virginia, September 26th, 1817.
My father’s name was James B. Jones, and my mother’s maiden
name was Elizabeth G. Cardwell, who was the daughter of Jeffrey Palmer.
My maternal grandmother, Mary Palmer, first married Cardwell.
The offspring of this union were three daughters; Susan P., my mother,
and Obedience T. Susan P., the oldest of the daughters married Thomas O’Conner;
and Obedience, the youngest married William Wilson.
After the death of Cardwell my grandmother married a man by the name of Wray.
Cardwell died before I was born.
I several time saw Wray when I was a boy.
He and grandmother Wray were once at my father’s.
I distinctly recollect that he was quite a fleshy man.
Moses and Labon P. Wray were the only children of this marriage.
After my grandmother married Wray they lived in North Carolina
until the death of Mr. Wray. I
am under the impression that Mr. Wray was a citizen of North Carolina
when he married grandmother. After
the death of Mr. Wray, his widow and two sons, Moses and Labon, moved
back to Halifax County, Virginia, and lived with Uncle O’Conner.
As stated, her oldest daughter married Mr. O’Conner.
My understanding is that Mr. Wray was a widower when he married my
grandmother, and had one or more children living by a former wife; one of whom,
a daughter, married Mead Wilson, a brother of the Wilson that
married my aunt, Obedience T. My
aunt was always called “Biddy” in the family.
William Wilson moved from North Carolina to Henry
County, Tennessee some years before my father left Virginia for Tennessee.
Some two or three years after my father settled in Carroll County, Wilson
also moved to Carroll County.
My great-grandfather, Jeffery Palmer lived
near Hunting Creek Baptist Church, in Halifax County, Virginia.
He died after I was born, but I was too young to remember him.
He had five sons, Daniel, Jeffery, Moses, Labon and Henry Palmer.
Henry was the youngest of the sons.
I do not know that I am giving the names in order.
Henry had three daughters. One
married a man named Trainham; Mary, my grandmother first married Cardwell;
and one married a man named Threat—I believe that was his name, though I am
not positive. They lived in
Pittsylvania County, Virginia. I
saw her but once. I was quite a
little boy. Labon Palmer had
but one child, a daughter, who married a Mr. Boyd. I recollect to have seen Boyd and his wife when I was a boy
fifteen or sixteen years of age. They
were at uncle O’conner’s who lived near Halifax court house.
I had gone there to attend a camp meeting, and seems that they were there
for the same purpose. Mrs. Boyd was a very handsome lady.
Boyd and wife paid a visit to this country some years before I was
married. They were at Aunt O’Conner’s
and Mother’s, but I did not see them.
I several times, when a boy, visited Halifax; and I
knew all of my mother’s uncles, save Labon Palmer.
I don’t think I ever saw him. I
am under the impression that he lived in Pittsylvania County.
Daniel Palmer was a man of whom my children
have heard me speak as saying he “would never take another drink between
Toot’s Branch and Bannister’s, unless he felt like it.” Halifax courthouse is situated between Toot’s Branch and
Bannister River. Uncle Daniel and
some of the neighbors, as I heard the story, had been to the Court House one
day, and while there Uncle Daniel had taken a few drinks too many, and was
several sheets to the wind. Returning
home, he got a dunking in Bannister River, and as he thought, he was in danger
of being drowned. As he got out of
the river, on impulse of the moment, he exclaimed: “I will never take another
drink between Toot’s Branch and Bannister’s!”
Getting over his fright, and finding his money safe, after a long pause,
he added, “unless I feel like it.” I
expect he was always true to this promise.
Jeffery Palmer, the grandfather of my mother,
was a man of good property—might, I suppose, be said to have been wealthy.
Henry, the youngest of the boys, married Hanna, a
daughter of my great uncle, Elias Palmer. After his death, which was eight or ten years after my father
came to this section, his widow and some of her children moved to and settles in
Dyer County, Tennessee. Dr. Palmer
was one of her children. Her
daughter Susan married A. H. Smith, of McLemoresville.
A year or two after I was married, Aunt Hannah
visited Mother. She and Mother came
to Huntingdon and stayed with us several days.
Aunt Hanna looked quite natural. I
could see no change in her, except that she looked slightly older.
Mr. Smith and Cousin Susan, returning from a visit to Dyer, after
they were married, called and stayed all night with us.
I spent a delightful in talking to her about “Old Virginia,” and the
persons we had known.
Uncle Jeffery Palmer, my great-uncle, had a
daughter named Susan. She married a
man named Coats. He moved to
Hardeman County shortly after my father came to Tennessee.
In passing, he called on us; but for a great many years I have not heard
from him or his family.
When Aunt Hannah moved to this county, she left a
colored man behind. The owner of
his wife did not wish to part with her, and perhaps his wife preferred to
remain. After his death he came to
this country, and stayed several weeks at Mother’s.
He had belonged to her grandfather, Jeffery Palmer.
Mother had been raised on the plantation with him.
She was glad to meet with him. I
went to see mother while he was there. She
had him called in after supper, gave him a seat, and we had a long talk with him
about “old times,” and his old master, Jeffery Palmer, in particular.
The Lights, of Dyer County, are related to the Palmers.
Their mother was a sister of Aunt Hannah Palmer and a daughter of
old Uncle Elias Palmer.
I know but little about the other descendants of
great-grandfather Jeffery Palmer. We
kept up no correspondence with them after we came to Tennessee.
Indeed, I was thrown much with my mother’s relations.
When I was a boy my father lived in Charlette, and they in Halifax
County. I taken by my mother, when she visited them, and a few times
visited Uncle O’Conner’s family.
Jeffery Palmer, my great-grandfather, ante-dated the
Revolutionary War. I think he was
not a soldier in the war, but hired a substitute.
On the maternal side my ancestors were Huguenot
descent. During the persecution of
the Huguenots under Louis XIV of France, many of them fled from that country to
neighboring States. This was
especially the case after the repeal of the Edict of Nantes, in 1685.
Many of the Huguenots came to South Carolina, and some to other States,
North Carolina and Virginia. These
kept up correspondence among themselves and relatives, and occasionally visited
each other; so I learned from my mother. My
recollection is that it was my great-grandmother Palmer’s parents that
were among the fugitives.* (*Since
this was written, I have received a letter from one of the family relatives, who
states that my memory is correct as to fact.)
I heard that my mother and grandmother Wray
frequently speak about the Huguenots, their mode of dress, etc.
The older parties dressed pretty grandly, after the French style.
I have heard my mother speak of the fact that while in France there
Huguenots ancestors had a Bible. It
was kept in a large, heavy chair, with a spring bottom, or with the bottom
fastened down by a spring. Flax
threads were wound through all the leaves, passing over the back of the book,
where fastened together, for its better preservation.
When the Bible was read they always kept some one on the watch, to
prevent surprise. After reading, it
was carefully placed away in the chair, and the bottom fastened with the spring.
The chair was so constructed that you could handle it and never suspect
that anything was in it, or that it was anything more than a large framed chair.
My mother said that her grandmother Palmer was
one of the most elegant and quiet ladies she ever knew.
She never saw her give way to ill-temper or anger in her life, or do
anything unbecoming a lady. Her grandfather was a most excellent man, honorable in all
walks of life, but quick-tempered. In
this latter respect he and his wife differed.
I have, since my health gave way, frequently
regretted that I have not taken more interest in this part of the family
history, and learned from my mother, Grandmother Ray and Aunt O’Conner,
fuller particulars of our Huguenot progenitors. They knew the Huguenot families that first came to this
country, and could have given many interesting incidents connected with them.
As stated, it was my great grandmother Palmer’s grandparents
that were among the fugitives. My
name, “LeGrand Michaux,” is French; and this is the way we have the family
name. I do not know from what
country the Palmers emigrated.
Uncle O’Conner died during the first year
after my father came to Tennessee.
In the fall of 1836 my father went back to Virginia
to close up business, and Aunt O’Conner, her family, Grandmother Wray
and her two sons, Moses and Labon, came back with him.
After grandmother Wray was married the second time, she and her
husband went to North Carolina, taking with them her youngest daughter,
Obedience. My mother remained with
her grandparents until she got married.
Labon Wray, two or three years after coming to
Tennessee, married a Miss Hill, niece of Rev. James and Robert Hurt.
Wray died a few days after my return from Mexico, in the spring of 1847.
Moses Wray married a lady in Weakly County,
and died a few years after his brother Labon.
Grandmother Wray lived with Aunt O’Conner,
and died at an advanced age. She
was over eighty years when she died. I
have remarked that Aunt Hannah Palmer married Henry Palmer, her
cousin, son of Jeffery Palmer, the elder.
Elias Palmer lived on the Coles’ Ferry Road,
near where the Morton’s Ferry Road leaves that road. When a boy, I went with my mother several times to visit her
relatives in Halifax, and I was with her during those visits at his house.
He was quite an old man, and may have appeared older than he really was.
I understood that he was a soldier in the Revolutionary War.
I have heard my mother speak of the fact that he said the sweetest bread
he ever ate he made up in his handkerchief and baked in the ashes.
He and his command had been running from the British.
They at the time had nothing but a little corn-meal to eat.
Reaching a spring where a halt was ordered. They got water, and made up
his ration of meal, baked and ate, as stated.
The old gentleman was always fond of taking his peach brandy and honey
before breakfast. This was a very
common practice in his day.
My mother had a great uncle named LeGrand, who was
mortally wounded from a round shot or bomb in some battle in South Carolina.
She several times showed me a buckle he wore at the time.
It may have been a knee buckle. It has the appearance of having been
battered in some way. I suppose my
sister Betty Ann has it yet. Mother
stated how it was brought from South Carolina to Halifax, but I have forgotten.
It was sent as a memento.
On one of my mother’s visits to Halifax, she took Pleasant,
a colored boy, with her as a nurse. Pleasant
and myself are about the same age. When she got to Uncle O’Conner’s, Mother said to
Pleasant, “If you go through that gate,” meaning the yard gate, “I will
whip you.” Uncle O’Conner
was a wheelwright, and employed a good many hands in making wagons, etc. She was afraid to have Pleasant take the child out to
the shops, where the hands were engaged at work.
She had not been at Uncle O’Conner’s long before Pleasant
and the child were missing. Mother
called him up, and was about to let in on him, saying “Didn’t I tell you
that if you went through that gate I would whip you?” He at once answered: “Lord Mistiss, I didn’t go through
the gate; I got over the fence!” This
ended the matter. I never heard a
better piece of special pleading than this.
Pleasant is now living in Carroll County and doing well.
William Jones was the name of my paternal
grandfather. He also lived in Halifax County, not more than two miles from where
old Uncle Elias Palmer lived. I
was frequently at his house, when a boy. He died several years before my father came to Tennessee.
He was quite an old man at my earliest recollection.
For a year or two before he died he was somewhat paralyzed.
I recollect being at his house one time when he walked very badly, and
had to hold something to enable him to walk or stand.
His wife was a Miss Brown. She
was called Patsy. In my earlier
years I understood that my Grandfather Jones served a short time in the
Revolutionary War.
Two or three years after my father left Virginia,
Grandmother Jones and her family also came to Tennessee.
Her son, Uncle William Jones, and his family, R. Wyatt and
family (Wyatt had married her daughter Sarah), her daughters Jane and Betsy,
came with her. These daughters were
not married. Aunt Jane became
paralyzed, and died at my mother’s during the latter part of the war.
My Grandmother Jones lived to be very old, nearly one hundred
years. I do not recollect the year of her death.
After ninety years of age she was able to walk about the neighborhood.
Her memory had suffered but little from old age.
If she had a defective tooth in her head I do not know of it.
She was stoutly built, but not over medium height.
My great Grandfather Jones’ name was Robert,
as I learned. I am not able to
trace the paternal line beyond my grandfather, William Jones.
I do not know in what year his family came to this country.
I have always understood that they were Welch descent.
My son Silas will recollect Cousin Ryal Bryant,
who lived near Shady Grove, and who died a few years after the war.
I have stated that in the maternal line our ancestry
were French Huguenots, and that many Huguenots fled from France and settled in
South Carolina during the reign of Louis XIV.
Soon after coming to Tennessee, my father and Mr. Bryant became
acquainted. Bryant had moved
from South Carolina some years before my father came to this section, and was
living in Shady Grove, in Gibson County. After
becoming acquainted it was ascertained that his wife and my mother were related.
Both families belonged to the old Huguenot stock.
My mother and his wife, so I learned, were able to trace the
relationship. It was remote,
however; not nearer than third or fourth cousin; and hence, in speaking to or of
each other, I always said “Cousin Ryal’” and he, “Cousin LeGrand.”
Col. Jackson’s wife, Zack’s mother, was of
the same stock, as I understand. I
rather think that she and Bryant’s wife were sisters; am not certain; but this
can easily be ascertained. I was
frequently at Cousin Ryal Bryant’s house, but only slightly acquainted
with Col. Jackson. Zack Jackson
was the only member of the family with whom I was much acquainted.
I am not certain but that my father and Cousin Ryal were remotely
related.
My father’s people were Baptist.
I do not know that my grandfather Palmer or his sons were church
members, but I infer that they were Baptists in sentiment. When I was a boy
there were few Methodists and no Cumberlands in the section of Virginia in which
we lived. The Baptist was the
leading denomination, the Presbyterians next, and then the Episcopalian.
My father moved from Halifax County to Charlotte
County when I was in my second year; and lived as overseer on a plantation
belonging to Letsy Carrington. This
plantation was situated on the Roanoke, a small stream, near where it flowed
into Stanton River. At this place
my brother Silas was born. Father
lived here for two or three years, and then for six years lived as overseer on a
plantation owned by Paul Carrington.
This plantation lay twelve or fifteen miles higher up Stanton River.
No white families lived on either place at the time, save my father’s.
It was while father lived at this place that Silas and I first went to
school. I was not more than seven
years old, and Silas about eighteen months younger.
The school was in the Baptist church near Cole’s Ferry.
The house was a log building. It
was taken down a year or two after this, and a frame building put up in its
place. It was about four miles from
where my father lived; a pretty long walk for two little boys.
In bad weather we were generally taken to school, and frequently someone
would meet us in the evening. Our
teacher was a young man from the North. His
name was Hawley. Under him I
first studied grammar; Murray’s was the one used.
It was a large work and unsuited to beginners.
I committed the rules to memory, and could repeat them pretty well.
I will give for the benefit of my grandchildren the rules or definitions
for the noun and verb;
“A substantive or noun is the name of anything that
exists, or of which we have any notion, as London, man, virtue.”
“A verb is a word which signifies to be, to do, or
to suffer, as, I am, I rule, I ruled.”
I had no conception of the meaning of these rules at
the time. My teacher never
explained them to me. Had he done
so I would readily understood their meaning.
I have never had much respect for his memory.
I have taught school myself and never had any trouble making children
understand “noun,” “verb” and “adjective;” indeed, the leading parts
of speech.
My father next lived with Mrs. Carrington, the
mother of Paul Carrington, for five years. She and her family lived on a plantation lying on the Roanoke
and Twitty’s Creek, three or four miles above the one first mentioned.
There were many such plantations in this part of Virginia at the time of
which I speaking. Many of the owners lived in baronial style.
John Randolph’s residence was three miles up
Stanton River from the Letsy Carrington place. He owned several plantations in Charlotte County.
The wealth, culture, refinement and hospitality of Virginia were found in
these homes. When Randolph rode from home he went in his coach drawn by
four horses, and attended by two servants.
He was a real aristocrat, and in many respects a remarkable man.
As an orator he was never excelled by any in his state, except Patrick Henry.
There is now a railroad which runs down Twitty’s
Creek and crosses Stanton River some short distance above where Roanoke empties
into it.
I have some slight recollection a few things that
occurred while my father lived at that place first mentioned.
I remember some ladies visiting my mother at one time, and also pulling
up or rolling up my pants and wading in a pond of water.
Of course I got a scolding for it. I
think an old mare or horse got after me one day and scared me pretty badly.
My recollection is tolerably distinct after my father
moved to the place belonging to Paul Carrington.
It was the first year that my father lived at this place that a mare
kicked me and broke my leg. I had seen my father and some of the Negro men milk her.
She may have lost her colt, as a reason for this.
My father and a Negro man were standing around her one day, and I thought
I would milk her too. She kicked me
and broke my left leg between the hip joint and knee.
My father carried me into the house, laid me on a bed, and examined my
leg to see if it was broken. He
sent for a doctor. My leg was set
and bandaged; A nice little box was made, a part of which ran under my left arm;
my leg was placed and confined in it by passing cords over the box, and in this
way I lay on my back for a number of weeks.
This same mare ran away with me a few years after this time.
My father, my mother had attended a Fourth of July celebration.
We crossed Stanton River at Cole’s Ferry; the celebration was just on
the other side of the river from the Ferry.
My father was on horseback and I was on the grey mare.
Mother, the other children, and, I think, some ladies were in the
carryall. In returning, after crossing the river, (there were a number
of persons in company), I was riding behind the carryall with my father and some
others. A light shower of rain came
up; the mare became restless, and I became alarmed. I was only about ten years old.
She dashed by the carryall and ran through some small timber.
I held my head down to keep from being knocked off by the limbs.
The mare put out for home as hard as she could clatter.
I knew that ahead of us there was a long hill to descend, and I was
afraid that in going down this hill I would either fall off or thrown over her
head and killed. Just before
reaching the hill, the road, as I knew, passed over a level piece of ground.
I made up my mind to jump off when I reached this place in the road.
I picked my place on reaching sandy part of the road, and threw myself
off, trying to catch on my feet, but found myself on my back.
I knew Mother was alarmed, and that someone would follow on to see what
became of me. So I sprang upon my
feet. In a moment or two some one
came in sight, and seeing me standing, turned back to let Mother know I was
safe.
In the fall of 1832 my father rented a place of a man
named Barksdale, lying on Stanton River, six or seven miles west of
Watkins’s Store, and lived there until 1833.
He then rented a plantation from Mrs. Read, lying on Twitty’s
Creek, two or three miles east of Watkins’ Store.
In the fall of 1833, while my father was living at
the Barkesdale place, the wonderful meteoric show occurred, about which
much has been written. Brother
Silas and I were sleeping up stairs. About
day, or perhaps a little before, Charles (a colored man) came running to the
house, crying out in great alarm, “Master! Master! The stars are falling!”
This awoke Silas and myself, and we came down stairs.
The heavens were ablaze with what seemed to be falling stars.
It was a grand, a wonderful and an awful sight.
The explosive and whizzing sounds of the meteors were continually heard.
Long streams of fiery light remained in the track of many of them.
The meteoric shower continued until obscured by the morning light.
The whizzing sound of the meteors, though somewhat abated, could be heard
for some time after it was too light to see them.
Father and Mother looked serious, but not alarmed, and hence I was not
frightened. Many thought that the
last day had come, and hence were much alarmed.
Charles at this time was not a professor of religion.
My father was a deacon of the Baptist Church from my
earliest recollection. His
membership was first with a church not far from Coles’ Ferry; the same
building at which the school taught, of which I have spoken.
When he moved to Mrs. Carrington’s he joined the Baptist Church
near Watkins’ Store, called Mossingford.
His membership remained with this church until he left Virginia for
Tennessee.
Abner W. Clopton
was the leading Baptist minister in that part of Virginia in which my father
lived. He was the first preacher of
any denomination that I recollect having seen or heard. He was an educated man—I think a graduate of Chapel Hill,
North Carolina. He was greatly
respected by all classes and denominations, and beloved by the members of his
churches. He was eminently useful.
He was conservative and liberal in his views, and preached Baptist
doctrines in charity to all other denominations.
From my earliest recollection until his death, he was frequently at my
father’s house, and I knew him better than any other minister of the Gospel.
His demeanor was marked by gravity, and, as I thought, shaded at times by
an expression of sadness. His
churches all prospered under his ministry.
I have heard my father remark that he knew men who were more gifted in
the pulpit, but as a pastor, and for influence the community, he knew no man who
was quite his equal. When I was a
small boy he introduced Sabbath-school in his churches.
I think he was the first to introduce them in that part of the state.
In connection with Sunday-schools he organized Bible classes for the
purpose of studying the Scriptures. There
was a class of this kind in the Baptist church near Coles’ Ferry.
A year or two after this class was organized, I heard my father speak of
the fact that, with one or two exceptions, the young men who were members of the
class had all professed religion. He
also at an early day introduced temperance societies in the community in which
he lived. I and my brother Silas,
thought small boys, joined the society. The
members were pledged against the use of all intoxicating liquors, except when
necessary as a medicine. I have at
all times kept pretty close to this pledge.
My father at first did not join. He
said he was getting old and did not expect it would be a benefit to him; but was
heartily in favor of the young becoming members, to whom the pledge would most
probably be beneficial. But it was
not long before he changed his mined and joined; giving as his reason that his
example should be on the right side. I
can remember when my father was in the habit of taking his daily dram; but after
he became a member of the society I never knew of his touching a drop, and he
was ever afterwards a decided advocate of abstinence from all intoxicating
drinks.
Elder Clopton
impressed upon the members of his churches, who were heads of families, the
importance of holding family worship. He
attached great importance to the early and proper training of children.
He wished to see the family altar set up in every house.
It was under his influence that my father began having family prayers.
I remember the first night that Father held prayers in his family.
I suppose I was at the time about twelve years old.
The fifty-first division of Psalms was read upon that occasion.
After this my father kept up family worship during his life.
Elder Clopton conducted protracted meetings very much as my
children have seen Brother Hillsman conduct such meetings.
The anxious were invited to the front seat, and the church would join
with and for them in prayer. He
frequently, at the regular meetings, gave the invitation, if any present
desired, and the church would join in prayer for them.
It was during a protracted meeting at Mossingford
that my brother Silas professed religion. He
was then about eleven years old. He
joined the church and was baptized by Brother Clopton, who had also
baptized my mother.
Elder Clopton was active in the cause of
missions. He taught the members of
his church that it was a duty enjoined by Scriptures to aid in preaching the
Gospel to every creature. Some of
those members have emigrated to the Tennessee country; and whenever you meet
with one of them it is not difficult to get him to cast in his mite to help send
the word of life to the heathen.
He generally had one or more men with him whom he was
training for the ministry. I
remember James McAlister and Isaac S. Tinsly.
McAlister, I think, was consumptive, and died young.
Tinsley’s name appears as a delegate to the convention, in 1841,
that organized the Southern Baptist Convention.
I have stated that Clopton preached the
distinctive doctrines of the Baptist plainly and clearly, when he thought the
occasion required; but he was careful to give no unnecessary offense to other
denominations. He had one Sabbath
morning baptized a large number of persons at Mossingford, and before
administering the ordinance gave the reason why Baptist practice immersion.
On returning to the church, Tinsly took as his text the 19th
and 20th verses of the 28th chapter of Matthew, and
preached a sermon upon the subject of Baptism, antagonizing the practice of
other denominations. After we returned from church I heard Father and Mother
conversing about the sermon Tinsly had preached. Father said that after the congregation was dismissed Brother
Clopton had a conversation with him, in which he said: “I thought I
said all that was necessary on the subject at the water.
I did not know that Tinsly intended to preach such a sermon.
I thought his discussion was ill timed.”
He thought Tinsly should have advised with him before preaching
such a sermon. My father entirely agreed with him. A good many Presbyterians attended the Baptist church that
day; none of them were brought over to the Baptist views, and the Baptist were
already strong enough in the faith.
My brother Clopton, who was mortally wounded
at the Battle of Stone’s River, near Murfreesboro, was named for Elder Clopton.
The Baptist house for worship at Mossingford was a
large frame building, with a long wing at the left of the pulpit for colored
people, separated by a low railing from that portion of the building occupied by
the whites. The church had a large
colored membership. Many of John Randolph’s
negroes belonged to this church. Randolph
had a colored man named Phil. Elder Clopton and my father had great respect for Phil, as a
worthy, upright Christian. When any
of Randolph’s negroes proposed joining the church, my father always
consulted with Phil as to their Christian character.
Phil’s opinion was generally, if not invariably, accepted and
followed by the church.
Services were held monthly on Saturday and Sunday;
and many colored people were permitted to attend church on Saturday.
The Sacrament was administrated to the white and colored people at the
same time, the colored members remaining in that portion of the building
allotted to them. On these
occasions my father or some one of the deacons would hand the bread and wine to
the colored deacons, and would pass them around them around to the colored
members, while the white deacons waited on the white members.
I recollect on one occasion, when there was a large congregation in
attendance, some white men, not knowing the rules of the church took seats in
that portion of the church set apart for the colored people.
My father quietly stepped up to them and told them their mistake. They understood, and in a very orderly manner left the seats
they had taken.
Daniel Witt.—I
remember Witt very well. He
was frequently at my father’s house when I was a boy.
He was then a young man. He
was well set; a little below medium height.
There was a good deal of suavity in his composition. He was very
agreeable and pleasant in the social circles, and attractive as a preacher. His style was never studied, but easy and fluent; he never
hesitated for a word. At times he
became animated, but never impassioned. He
never tired his congregation, but left his hearers feeling they wished he had
preached a little longer. This is
the impression I have retained of him from my boyhood.
I do not remember him being at my father’s house, or seeing him, for
several years before my father left Virginia.
I suppose he was occupying some other field of labor.
J. B. Jeter.—I
saw him several times at Mossingford. I
remember something of his personal appearance; he was tall and spare. But I have retained no impression whatever of his style of
preaching. He was also a young man
at the time; he had not been preaching long.
I had seen and heard Witt before I saw Jeter.
Elder John Weatherford.—My
father and mother both knew Elder Weatherford before they were married,
and had frequently hear him preach. I
have heard my mother speak of his being at her grandfather Palmer’s
when she was a girl.
Weatherford, before the Revolutionary War, had been imprisoned
in Chesterfield jail for preaching. In
my boyish days I thought it very strange that any one had ever been imprisoned,
in this country, for preaching. I
desired very much to see a man who had been imprisoned for preaching.
While imprisoned, people frequently gathered around the jail, and
Weatherford would preach to them from the jail window.
To prevent this, a wall or some obstruction was built in front of the
window; but, not to be out-done, people would frequently gather around the wall,
and upon some signal he would preach to them.
It was stated that, as a signal, a handkerchief would be hoisted upon a
staff or pole.
About 1830 or 1831, Elder Weatherford visited
many of the churches he had preached in his earlier days.
While on this round, he came to Mossingford and was present on Saturday
and Sunday, the regular days for worship. He
preached on Sunday. He was then
very old; I believe it was said he was something over ninety years at the time. His appearance indicated great age. His feeble condition was very apparent. He was tall and inclined to be raw-boned.
He wore a knit woolen cap on his head all the time.
In later years, though I thought nothing of it at the time, I could look
back and see that he was a man of marked character; that he was a man among men,
cut out for a leader.
There was a seat prepared for him in front of the
pulpit. My father took me and my
next oldest brother, presented us to him, and took our hands in his.
All, all nearly all, the older people shook hands with him as they came
to the church. Some of them seemed
very much affected at meeting with him. To
many of them he had some remark to make. His
text on Sunday was Luke ii:10-11 “Behold, I bring you good tidings,” etc. Elder Clopton read the text at Weatherford’s
request. I think he could not see
well enough to read; but could talk. At
times he became animated, and was highly interested in his subject.
Judging from what I recollect of his manner on the occasion, he must,
when in the vigor of manhood, have preached with no ordinary power and effect.
As he closed his sermon, he remarked that the gospel he had that day
attempted to preach was the same he had preached to listening crowds from the
window of Chesterfield jail. It was
the only allusion he made to his imprisonment.
Before he closed his sermon, my father went up into the pulpit, stood by
his side and held him up. His wife,
who was sitting near my father, requested him, as I afterwards learned, to go
and stand by him, for fear of his falling.
At the conclusion of his sermon, Elder Clopton said to the
congregation that the older citizens all knew the character and circumstances of
the old brother. If any of them
wished to contribute anything to him and his wife, they could do so as they left
the church. It seemed to me that
almost everybody wished to give them something.
Indeed, during his tour the people everywhere, as I learned, showed their
regard for him by liberal contributions. I
think home at that time was Pittsylvania.
This tour of elder Weatherford brought up the
subject of his imprisonment and release, and I heard it talked of by my father
and others. It was the received
opinion of that day that he was released through the instrumentality of Patrick Henry.
Just how this was effected I do not know.
Mr. Henry was regarded, in the part of Virginia in which my father
lived, as the great pioneer of religious liberty.
In his speeches and public utterances upon this subject, tradition said
he was bold and outspoken.
My father and the men of his day were in their
earlier years acquainted with many persons who attended the Revolutionary War,
and who were contemporary with Mr. Henry and Elder Weatherford;
and I do not well see how they could be mistaken as to these important facts.
The fact of Weatherford’s imprisonment would especially have attracted
the attention of Baptists at the time. It
was a matter in which they were deeply interested.
They could but have felt they were persecuted in the person of their
leader; and it would naturally have been a matter of frequent conversation when
they met. His release, and by whose
instrumentality, would have been a matter of equal interest; and hence I cannot
see how they could have been mistaken, or the traditions of the time erroneous.
Others may speak disparagingly of the part Mr. Henry took in the
cause of religious liberty, and the protection he gave Baptists; but surely Baptists
would never do this.
That Mr. Henry looked to the entire separation
of church and state, when he became the advocate of religious liberty, is more
than I can say. How this was I do
not know. But it is easy to see
that, the first great step taken, the others would necessarily follow.
The part borne by Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Madison
and others in this cause, at a later day, was more a matter of record and of
written history at the time, and hence, has been better preserved.
That borne by Mr. Henry was mainly in speeches and public
utterances. It was in this way that
he gave impetus to the cause of religious liberty.
But these utterances not being reduced to writing at the time, his work
soon became to rest mainly in tradition, liable to pass away and be forgotten.
John Keer.—In
the fall of 1833 I attended a meeting at Wynn’s Creek Camp Ground, Halifax
County. It was there that I saw and
heard John Keer. In person
he was noble and commanding. His
voice was deep, full-toned and of great compass.
There was a large congregation in attendance.
The occasion was to animate him and call forth his powers.
His text was Ezekiel xxxiii:11. I
have never heard such a sermon, or heard such a public speaker. I have seen no man in Church or State that possessed his
power an orator. He possessed great
power. Much of the sermon I
remember to his day. There were no
mere flights of the imagination, no dealing in fancy work.
His language was plain and simple, and every word seemed to be used to
carry conviction to the minds and hearts of the hearers.
With him words were things. You
saw things as he saw them; you felt as he felt; your mind followed his mind; his
convictions became your convictions. At
one time he drew a picture of Satan with his black banner, his Satanic
followers, and the dark and hideous crowd which followed that banner; and in
immediate contrast he presented Christ with the banner of the Cross, all radiant
with light and love and glory, and the happy and blessed throng of heaven and
earth as his attendants. The choice
between the two was demanded. The
impulse seemed irresistible to burst away from Satan and his black and hideous
followers, and to fly to the banner of Christ and the Cross.
Elias Dodson, a name familiar to the Baptist
of North Carolina and Virginia, was several times at my house some years after I
came to Trenton. On one of these
occasions I mentioned having heard Keer, and the impression he made upon
me. Dodson had often heard him.
He fully concurred in the opinion I had formed.
As illustrative of his great power over hearers, Dodson related an
incident that occurred in some public place where Keer was preaching.
The place I have forgotten: A young man was ridiculing to his companions
the idea that one could not sit unmoved under Keer’s preaching.
He said it was all weakness, and would show them.
“I will go and hear him, and you shall see that I will behave
myself and not give way to any such weakness.”
The young man went, full of self conceit, and took a prominent seat in
front of the stand. He was one of
the first to surrender and cry out for mercy.
REMOVAL TO TENNESSEE.—My
father left Virginia for West Tennessee in October, 1835.
The weather was all that could be desired, and we gad a very pleasant
time on the road. Mother had been
in bad health for some years, and it was thought she would have to stay in some
house at night. But she stayed in
our tent every night while traveling. Her
health began to improve from the first, and continued to improve to the end of
the journey. We had been on the
road but a day or two, when we fell in company with Elder Elisha Collins,
the grandfather of E. A. Collins of Milan, Tenn.
The meeting, I think, was by previous arrangement.
Elder Collin was moving out some negroes to Henderson County.
His white family was not brought out until the next fall. We traveled in company until we passed Columbia, when Elder Collins
kept the road to Henderson County. My
father turned to the right, crossed the Tennessee River at Reynoldsburg, and
came through Henry County to see Uncle Wilson’s family.
Elder Collins was a Baptist preacher.
He was a well-informed man, and decidedly more than average pulpit
ability.
My father had accumulated a right handsome property,
for the times, before leaving Virginia. His
property consisted mainly in Negroes. The first year after coming to Tennessee he rented a place
from a man named David Marshall, lying about two miles south and west of
McLemoresville. That summer he
bought the land on the Paris Road, north and west of McLemoresville, on which
this family lived until Mr. Brower sold and moved to Trezevant, a few years ago.
My
father was a soldier in the war of 1812. His
command was in Washington soon after the British left the city.
He went as far as Ellicott’s Mills, in Maryland.
He was a man of unblemished Christian character, respected and beloved in
every community in which he lived. He
was an active and leading member in his church.
I have thought he lived as near the golden rule, “As ye would that that
men should do to you, do ye even so to them,” as by any man I ever saw.
My father died on the 9th of November,
1840. He was about 55 years of age.
His end was entirely peaceful. Old
Brother Baylor Walker talked with him on the subject of his hope a few
days before he died. He had no
fears of death. He expressed
himself with great satisfaction as to his hope.
I was present and heard the conversation.
A few days before he had this conversation with Brother Walker, he made
some remark which led me to believe he thought he would get well.
I said to him, “I do not think you are going to leave us, Father; but
if you should, I will do the best I can for Mother and the children.
These were the only words that ever passed between us on the subject.
I have ever remembered them, and feel that I have been faithful to what I
then said to him.
His estate was a good deal embarrassed when he died;
and for several years the management of his affairs, in my efforts to save the
property, cost me no little anxiety and many sleepless nights.
My father and mother had the following children: The
writer LeGrand Michaux, named for our Huguenot ancestors (I write the name in
full for the benefit of my grandchildren); Silas P., born April 29th,
1819; Paul S., Abraham C., Isaac W., James D., Bettie Anna, and a daughter named
Mary, about a year old when we left Virginia. This daughter died soon after we came to this country.
After coming to this country, Clopton and Doddridge were born; Clopton,
the year after we came to Tennessee, while living on the Marshall olace;
Doddridge, after Father bought and settled on the place I have referred to.
Bettie Ann was born on March 20th, 1833.
She married Mr. Thomas K. Brower, Nov. 19th, 1851.
Clopton and Doddridge both enlisted in the
Confederate service. Doddridge was
taken sick at Corinth, and carried to Memphis, where he waited on by Paul and
James until he died. James brought
the body home in a metallic case. It
was buried in the family burying ground.
Clopton was mortally wounded at the Battle of
Stone’s River, near Murfreesboro. He
lingered several days, and died. Mrs.
Thomas Hutcherson, sister of John and Bennett Hillsman, saw him
while in the hospital after he was wounded, and talked with him.
He sent word to Mother by Mrs. Hutcherson that he was not afraid
to die. He was well cared for in
the hospital until his death. Some of the children, after the war closed, wanted to bring
the body home and bury it in the family grave-yard.
But Mother opposed it, saying she could not bear it.
Clopton and Doddridge were both professors of religion, and members of
the church at McLemoresville.
My daughter Clopton is named for her uncle Clopton,
and my son Doddridge for his uncle Doddridge.
MY MOTHER.—My mother lived a widow for about
twenty-eight years. She was born
the 28th of May, 1798, and died on the 30th of February,
1869. I received a dispatch about
the middle of the day that she was seriously ill.
I left my office, went out home; and in short time was on my way to see
her. I got to her house a little
after dark. She lived five or six
days after I reached the old homestead. I
remained her to the end, and saw her buried in the family burying-ground.
My father selected this place; and was the first to be buried in it.
While Mother was sick she saw all her children, save Abraham, who was in
Arkansas. Her end was entirely
peaceful. I talked with her on the
subject. She told me all was well
with her. There were no clouds
between her and the better world.
My mother was greatly above the average woman.
She possessed large common sense, strong will, decision of character; and
was eminently fitted to govern a household.
She united in a high degree business qualities with refinement and
delicacy of feeling. Her strong
will was tempered by good sense and a gentle and loving nature.
She was a fine housewife, an excellent economist, and was rarely, if
ever, excelled in those qualities of heart and mind that make the model wife and
mother.
March, 1843, was a remarkable month.
It was the coldest month of the year.
I never before saw, nor since have seen, the weather in March anything
like so cold. There were several
heavy snow storms during the time; and from early in the month up to about the
24th the ponds and creeks were covered with ice four or five inches
thick. Fine ice was gathered on the
creek at Huntingdon and put up during this time.
The great comet of 1843 also made its appearance
during this month. It came from the
west and passed around the sun, going so near the sun that its nucleus was not
seen, at least not with the naked eye. The
tail was not seen until the comet had passed nearly around the sun and was
leaving the earth. When first seen,
it appeared in all its beauty and splendor. To the eye, the tail appeared to extend half way up the
heavens. The concurrence of the
comet and the severe cold of March caused some to feel serious, imagining that
the near proximity of the great comet was affecting our atmosphere.
STUDY OF THE LAW.—About
a year after my father’s death, I borrowed Blackstone’s Commentaries of G.
H. Raulston, of Huntingdon; studied law at home awhile; Then went to
Huntingdon and studied under Judge B. C. Totton.
He was an older brother of Judge A. O. W. Totton. In April, 1843, I obtained license to practice law.
My license was signed by Judge Totton and by Judge Reed, of
Jackson, Tenn. I was then in my
twenty-sixth year.
TRIP TO MEXICO.--In
June, 1846, I started as a member of a volunteer company for the Mexican War.
H. F. Murray was the Captain of this company.
We landed on what was called Brazos Island about the first of July.
After some delay at this place, we passed on up the Rio Grande, and made
different encampments along the river. We
were not organized into a regiment until some little time after we left Brazos
Island. Four West Tennessee and
four East Tennessee companies composed the regiment.
W. T. Haskell was elected our colonel, and he appointed me
Sergeant Major. After the
organization of the regiment we moved up the river to Camargo, a town on a
stream that flows into the Rio Grande. Our camp was just above the town. Here the army corps to which we belonged remained until late
in the fall; when the march was taken up for Vera Cruz.
While at Camargo a great many of the men had diarrhea
and here we lost several of our company. When the regiment left I had been down with diarrhea for
several weeks, unable to travel, and was left in the hospital.
I remained at Camargo until the last days of December, when the sick, or
many of them, were taken by boat to Matamoras.
We were going down the river on Christmas day.
It was a beautiful day, warm enough to go about without wearing a coat.
I remained in the hospital at Matamoras until early in February, when I
obtained a furlough for the purpose of trying to get back home.
When I got back to Brazos Island, the place where we had debarked the
year before, I called on General Scott. When
he saw my condition, he gave me a discharge, telling me to get home, that I
would not be able to get back to Mexico. While
at Matamoras I was reduced almost to a skeleton.
There was one week of the time in which I do not think I ate as much as a
slice of light bread or drink a cup of tea.
I had to use beef tea.
N. B. Burrow, a brother of John J. Burrow,
called on me just before he left Matamoras for Vera Cruz.
I am sure he had no thought of my getting up again when he left.
He seemed very reluctant to leave me.
With the blessing of heaven, I reached New Orleans,
and took a boat to Will’s Point, Benton County. Brother Paul met me at this place with a horse, and so
I got safely home. It was a year or
two after I returned before my health was fully restore.
MARRAGES.—On the second of October, 1850, I married
Miss Cassandra Woods, daughter of Levi S. and Aranthia J. Woods.
Rev. James M. Hurt performed the ceremony.
MY WIFE’S MATERNAL ANCESTRY.—Mrs.
Woods was the daughter of James Dinwiddie, of Henry County. His father was also named James.
The older or last named Dinwiddie emigrated from Pennsylvania to
Virginia at an early day, remained some years, and in the summer of 1787 moved
to and settled in Fayette County, Kentucky; Whence; in the summer of 1792, he
moved to Madison County, Kentucky. Mr.
James Dinwiddie, my wife’s grandfather, was born in Virginia, September
9th, 1782, and died September 4th, 1860.
He was twice married. His
first wife was Cassandra Harris. She
was born September 18th, 1787, and they were married February 23rd,
1804. This marriage took place in
Kentucky. They had two children,
James and Aranthea Jane, who married Levi S. Woods.
Mrs. Woods’ brother, named for his father, married and lived near
Lavonia for a number of years. He
was a very intelligent man, of high moral worth.
I was acquainted with him. He
moved to Arkansas, and lived but a few years after he left Tennessee.
I tried to dissuade him from going to Arkansas.
He had been in poor health for many years. And thought the change would
be beneficial to him.
Grandfather Dinwiddie’s second wife was named Mary Carson.
She was born August 5th, 1786, and died September 18th,
1878. This marriage took place in
Virginia, December 29th, 1814. Mr.
Dinwiddie, my wife’s grandfather, moved to Carroll County, Tennessee,
in 1823; and in the fall of that year moved to Henry County, where he lived
until his death.
The children of Mr. Dinwiddie by his second
wife were: Thomas H., Newton, William, Baker and Mary.
James Dinwiddie, my wife’s
great-grandfather, moved to Henry County in 1824, where he lived until his
death. His wife’s maiden name was
Helm. I have not been able
to trace this branch of the family further back.
The Dinwiddies were all Presbyterians, but
after the great revival that broke out in Kentucky about 1800, and which
extended into Tennessee, they united with the Cumberlands.
I have at different times heard old persons speak of this revival; have
heard grandfather Dinwiddie speak of it.
This revival, in its character and circumstances, seems strange to us of
the present day. People were very
eager to hear the Gospel; they would go many miles to attend these meetings. At the meetings many would be prostrated; some would be found
lying on the ground in the woods as if insensible, and would remain in this
condition for hours; and when relieved from the conviction and burden of sin,
would rise rejoicing, seemingly from an unconscious state.
Mr. Dinwiddie was several times at my house
after I married his grand-daughter. I
formed a very high opinion of him. He
was a man of vigorous common sense, of noble impulses, leader in his church and
community, and one of the best citizens of Henry County.
I formed the opinion that in temper he was quick and impulsive, but
incapable (difficult to read) of mediating or doing what he believed to be
wrong. He was a very successful
farmer, and accumulated a handsome estate.
I learned from Cass that when he visited her mother he would, before
leaving, always call the family together and pray with and for them.
Mrs. Woods, my mother-in-law, died on the 28th
of March, 1853, aged forty-two years, five months, and two days; Col. Woods, on
the 28th of November, 1857. Both
were buried in the burying-ground at the Presbyterian Church, on the old stage
road leading from Huntingdon, of which church they were members.
Col. And Mrs. Woods had the following children: Nancy, who married
James M. Lanier, several years before I was married; Cassandra Charity Harris,
my wife; William James; Mary; John (always called Jack); Andrew; Georgia and
Levi, born Nov. 17th, 1848. They
all survived their parents.
My wife was named for her grandmother Dinwiddie
and her grandmother Woods. Her
grandmother Woods’ maiden name was Charity Dyzart.
After we went to housekeeping, my sister spent most
of her time with us, until her mother’s death, and went to school in
Huntingdon. She was a handsome,
fine looking girl. I have no
recollection of her being out of temper.
James studied law with me. Soon after his father’s death he married Susan Porter,
a cousin. She was a very lovely
girl. How I regretted to hear of
her death.
Levi S. Woods was the son of John Woods,
and he the son of Samuel Woods. Samuel
Woods’ father came from Ireland to North Carolina.
Judge Gideon B. Black, now of Trenton, Tenn., a grandson of Samuel
Woods, to whom I am indebted for facts relating to Samuel Woods
and his children, is not certain whether Samuel was born before or after his
father left Ireland. I have not
been able to learn the name of Samuel Woods’ father, or the date of his
immigration to this country. Samuel
Woods moved from South Carolina to Kentucky.
The date of his removal I have not been able to fix with satisfaction to
myself. Judge Black thinks
it was in 1773; but from historical facts in relation to the settlement of
Kentucky, I think this date must be too early by several years.
I will make some further allusions to the time of his removal, when I
have concluded what I have to say of his children.
He settled in what is now Madison County, Kentucky.
Samuel Woods had the following children: (1.) Oliver, the oldest,
born 1764 or 1765. He was killed by
the Indians. (2.) Martha, who
married John Dyzart. They
had four children, two sons and two daughters, the oldest boy named John.
(3.) Jane, who married John Herron. They had four children, one girl, who married her cousin John
Dyzart, and John, William and Frank Herron.
With the sons I was acquainted. (4.)
Margaret, who married Thomas Black.
This marriage took place in Kentucky, August 20th, 1793.
Of this marriage there were twelve children, among them Newton Black
and Judge Gideon B. Black, who was the youngest, born Feb. 4th,
1816. (5.) John Woods was their next child.
He was born April 21st, 1774, and died August 26th,
1846. These dates as to John Woods
are taken from family records. (6.)
The next was Samuel, who married Ann Perviance.
(7.) His next child was David, who married a Miss McLary.
They had several sons, who moved to Arkansas.
(8.) His next, Daniel T. who married a Miss Reese. They had several children, among them LeRoy, a distinguished
Cumberland Presbyterian preacher. (9.)
His next son was called Oliver, after his brother who was killed by the Indians.
(10.) His last child, a daughter named Polly, married John Holmes.
They had several children, among them John, William and Samuel Holmes.
Samuel Woods’ first wife was a Holmes.
He married in North Carolina. Judge
Black thinks this marriage took place about 1760; I should think a few
years later. After the death of his first wife, he married a second time,
but had no children by his last wife.
When Samuel Woods went to Kentucky, Judge Black
says he carried all his family with him, except his then youngest child,
Margaret, Black’s mother, who was about two years old; that he returned
for her, and during his absence his son Oliver was killed by the Indians, as
stated. Some neighbor boys and his
son Oliver were together; they heard what they took to be dogs barking, as if
they had brought something to bay. They
went in the direction of the barking. Indians,
in ambush, fired upon them and killed Oliver; the others escaped.
I suppose the Indians were imitating the barking dogs to decoy the boys
from the house.
My reason for thinking Judge Black must be
mistaken as to the date when his grandfather moved to Kentucky is, that it does
not agree with the historic fact, as to the earliest settlement of Kentucky.
In the American edition of the Encyclopedia Britanica it is stated that
the first permanent settlement in Kentucky was made at Harrosburg, in 1774.
(See Article “Kentucky”; also Edward S. Ellis’ life of Boone, page
53.) The fort at Boonsboro was
completed in the autumn of 1774. (Same
author, page 60). On page 64, Boone
is made to say that his wife and daughter were the first white women who ever
“stood upon the banks of the wild and beautiful Kentucky River.”
Boone reached Boonsboro in the fall of 1774.
These authorities are in harmony with my former reading upon the subject,
and lead me to conclude that Judge Black must be mistaken as to the date when
his grandfather, Samuel Woods, moved with his family to Kentucky.
I incline to think the removal must have taken place at some time between
the fall of 1775 and the year 1778. I
simply throw out these suggestions. Unless some written evidence can be had, the
precise date of the removal will always be in doubt.
Judge Black is remarkable for his recollection of family names,
facts and dates. If he is in error
as to the dates to which I referred, I should hardly think that the error began
with him, but with his ancestors, from which he received his information.
Samuel Woods lived in Kentucky until about
1800, when he moved to Williamson County, Tennessee, and settled on Harpeth
Lick. He afterwards moved to the
house of his son Samuel, who lived near McLemoresville, Carroll County,
Tennessee, where he died about 1825. He
was, as I understood, largely over eighty years of age when he died.
He was of Scotch-Irish decent, and a Presbyterian.
Judge Black tells me he was a member of the Paint Lick church in
Kentucky, and that one David Rice preached at the church.
MY WIFE”S PATERNAL ANCESTRY.—John
Woods, son of Samuel Woods, my wife’s grandfather, was married
three times. His first wife was
Charity Dyzart. They were
married Nov. 9th, 1799. She
was born June 22nd, 1788, and died Nov. 14th, 1814.
His second wife, Margaret Dyzart, sister of his first wife was
born Nov. 18th, 1780; died Sept 25th, 1825.
They were married Nov. 14th, 1815.
His third wife was Mrs. Hester Ann Craven, born Oct. 15th,
1788. There were no children by this marriage.
His children were: Levi S., born Sept. 1st,
1801, died Nov. 1st 1857. Harvey,
his second son, born February, 1804, died August 1864, in Mississippi; he was a
Presbyterian preacher. Dyzart,
his third son, born Jan. 21st, 1806, died Feb. 8th, 1882,
in Arkansas. Margaret, his oldest
daughter, was born in February, 1808, and died Nov. 11th, 1865; she
married Dr. Drake; she died at her home near Lavenia, Carroll County, Tennessee.
Nancy, his second daughter, was born June 9th, 1810, and died
Aug. 14th, 1848; she married her cousin, John Herron—Heron lived
near Spring Creek, Madison County, Tennessee, at the time of his death.
A daughter, Syrena, born May 3rd, 1812, died July 16th,
1824. John Woods Jr. born Nov. 9th,
1814, died April 19th, 1841, in the neighborhood of Hickory Flat,
Carroll County, Tennessee; he left a daughter, an only child, who was called
Mat, and who was at our house several times after we married; she married Dr. Taliaferro,
living in Paris, Tenn.; they went to Texas.
These were the children of John Woods, Sr., by his first wife.
The children of his second wife were: Carey H. Woods,
born Aug. 29th, 1816, died July 17th, 1885, in Middle
Tennessee; Charity, who married Dr. Clark, born April 12th,
1818, died Sept 1st, 1843, in the neighborhood of Hickory Flat; David
Woods, born Oct 28th, 1822, died Dec. 13th, 1874,
in Tipton County, Tennessee; William H. Woods, born July 25th, 1825,
died January, 1850, in California. For
the dates of births and deaths of John Woods and his children I am
indebted to Mary Woods, now of Texas, a daughter of Carey Woods
and wife of Andrew Woods, a brother of my wife.
When she visited Middle Tennessee in the summer of 1891, she copied them
from the family record of John Woods and sent them to me.
As stated in the preface to this little family sketch, I have left it to
my children and the younger members of my wife’s family to collect and
preserve the more recent facts of our families.
To have attempted more on my part would have imposed to great a tax upon
me in my broken-down condition.
John Woods moved to Carroll County in 1819.
He was one of the first settlers. He
first settled on what afterwards became the stage road leading from Huntingdon
to Jackson, and about 12 miles from Huntingdon.
When I first knew the place, it was generally know as the “old Woods
stand.” He afterwards moved to
the place near Hickory Flat, where he lived until his death.
His son, Carey H., lived on it after him, until he sold to James H.
Lanier a few years after the war.
I learned from Col. Woods that when his father
moved to West Tennessee there were no grist mills in the county, and that they
had to send to Trace Creek. Across Tennessee River, for meal or to have their
corn ground. The country was then
full of game. Deer, bears and wild
turkeys were abundant. There was no
trouble about getting meat; the difficulty was to get bread.
Col. Woods was about eighteen years old when his father came to
Carroll County: “Matthew Henry’s Commentaries,” that I now have, belonged
to John Woods, and after his death to his son, Levi S.
The spectacles I gave Silas, to have refilled and mended, also belong to
him. I accidentally broke the
glasses out of them a few years ago. I
never knew John Woods, though my father had been in the county more than
ten years before his death. Being
an old Presbyterian, I am told he did not believe in shouting; but it was no
uncommon thing for him to come home from church in a shouting frame of mind.
I learned from Cass that he was a very pious, godly, upright man.
Samuel Woods and James Dinwiddie, my
wife’s great-grandfather, became acquainted while they lived in Kentucky.
The older members of their families were also acquainted, and in this way
Col. Woods was led to visit his future father-in-law’s house after they
came to Tennessee, and became acquainted with his daughter and married her.
After I was married I became acquainted with Mrs. Drake.
She was very sprightly, companionable lady, full of life.
She was a superior woman, full of energy, and possessed rare business
qualities. I was very favorably
impressed with her.
She died soon after the close of the war.
My wife went to see her after the war.
I did not see her for several years before her death.
I first visited my future father-in-law’s house
during Christmas week, 1849, in company with John Boyd.
Col. Woods was living on John Branch, First District of Carroll
County. He had an excellent home.
Cass was not at home; she was on a visit to her relatives in Henry
County. We stayed all night and
left the next morning. I liked the
appearance of things. As I was
about leaving, I handed Col. Woods a book, and told him he might out it
in his book-case and give it to his daughter when she returned.
My daughter Nannie now has the little book. I at the time was attending to a law-suit for Col. Woods.
I had met his daughter Cass at Huntingdon, and slightly acquainted with
her.
Boyd and Col. Woods were Democrats, I a Whig.
Boyd was sheriff of Carroll County, and as he told me was in the habit of
calling at the Woods’ when in that part of the county.
As we were riding off, I said, “John, I like the way things look at
this place; you must come with me here again before a great while.”
Some time about the first of March we went a second time.
Cass was at home. John left next morning on business—believe I stayed till
evening. Before leaving I said to
Miss Woods: “I will be passing to Jackson early in April, and with your
permission I will call.” She
consented, and I did so. After this
I made it convenient to have business in that part of the county quite often. I had visited her but a few times before I proposed to her to
become a member of the firm. I told
her, while talking on the subject, that I much of my time from home; that she
would have to run the house, while I ran the law branch of the concern.
We agreed to unite our fortunes for life.
But a word passed between Col. Woods and myself upon the subject
of my and his daughter’s marriage. He
gave his consent. I told him I
would like to see Mrs. Woods before leaving.
She came into the parlor. I
took my seat to the left and a little in front of her.
I recollect well how I was sitting.
I asked her consent to our marriage.
She was entirely self-possessed, but her countenance indicated
seriousness when she entered the room. Her
conversation with me upon the subject was a very proper one for the occasion; a
shade of seriousness coloring her remarks.
Towards its close she spoke of the risks girls took in marrying; saying
that their happiness depended entirely upon the conduct of the husband.
She repeated and emphasized this idea.
Mrs. Woods had, I think, done all the talking up to this time.
I had been silent. I then
said to her: “Mrs. Woods, you don’t think the risk is all on the part
of your daughter, do you? Don’t
you suppose there is some on my part also?
I propose making your daughter a good husband.
I think I know something of the duties the relation will impose on me.
If your daughter’s happiness will in great measurable in my hands, will
not mine be equally so in her hands”?
My remarks dispelled all her seriousness; her face
brightened up; she smiled and became quite cheerful. Indeed, I am not sure she did not laugh.
I have frequently thought of this little incident between my
mother-in-law and myself and have always been inclined to smile at the manner in
which the subject passed off.
We were married, as I have already stated, on 2nd
of October, 1850. In about two
weeks after we were married, I said to Cass, “Would you not like to go and see
your parents?” She had not
suggested it to me, but I knew she would like to see home.
So we went to see the family. I
said to Mrs. Woods while there, “I knew Cass would like to see you al,
though she had not said so much to me. She
felt, I suppose, that such a suggestion might be a little hasty on her part.”
We spent a couple of days with the family.
On leaving I said to Mrs. Woods, “I cannot always command my
time; my business takes me from home a great deal, as you know.
Cannot say when I will be here again; but Cass shall come and see you as
often as she may wish.” It was
some months after before Cass and I went together to see her parents. Cass had, however, in the meantime visited home.
While on this visit I made it convenient to say something like this to
Mrs. Woods, in a rather low tone, as though I did not wish Cass to hear me; in
her presence, however, knowing that she would hear me: “This girl you gave me
is getting the upper hand of me pretty fast.
I think she is taking a right good start in this direction.”
I can’t call up the exact language I used; but I tried as delicately as
I could to carry with it the idea that I would be much obliged if she would
speak a kind word for me. Mrs. Woods
smiled; she no doubt thought of the conversation we had in the parlor when I
asked for her daughter. Some people
may talk of “mothers-in-law;” but I always loved my mother-in-law; I love to
think of her; I love her memory. Mrs.
Woods was a lady of fine sense. She
was full of energy, and an excellent housewife.
She had a great deal of family pride.
You could not be at home without seeing that see was an excellent
business woman. Everything about
her home bore the evidence of her industry.
She favored her father very much. I
have rarely seen a more striking resemblance between father and daughter.
I formed the opinion that she also bore a strong resemblance to her
father in point of character. She
was quick tempered, but always cheerful and pleasant.
She had nothing stubborn or sullen in her composition.
Col. Woods in his earlier days was fond of
keeping hounds about him, and would occasionally engage in the chase.
He had a couple of young hounds, after moving to John’s Branch, that he
thought a good deal of. They were
in the habit of sucking eggs and breaking Mrs. Woods’ hens’ nests.
They one day broke up a hen’s nest.
Mrs. Woods in a passion, as well she might be, said to a man whom
Col. Woods had employed about some work at the house; “ If you will
take those young dogs out and hang them, I will give you two bits.”
He did so. Col. Woods
mad rather a long face about the dogs, but said nothing to Mrs. Woods
about them. When he settled with
the man for his work he left out the two bits for hanging the dogs.
The man said to him: “You have forgotten the two bits Mrs. Woods
promised me for killing the dogs.” He
paid them without a word. I have
heard Cass tell this several times. It
is doubtful whether her mother was in earnest about having the dogs killed. She made the remark in a passion, not thinking perhaps that
the man would take her at her word.
Col. Woods was a man of fine personal
appearance. He was about six feet
high, and slightly corpulent when I first saw him.
His features were highly intellectual.
He would have readily been picked in any company as no ordinary man.
He was one of the most sensible men I ever knew.
He was well balanced; his character was finely rounded off.
He seemed to have entire control of all his conduct.
He understood human nature, and exercised a large share of influence in
the community in which he lived. I
never heard him say or do anything that was not characterized by propriety and
good sense. I was never with him a day without feeling I had been
benefited in some way or other. He
was a very affectionate husband. I
have heard my wife say she never at ant time heard her father give her mother a
cross or unkind word.
He and Mr. W. W. Herron were for some years
engaged in mercantile business as partners, at Hickory Flat.
They then went to Henry County, Tennessee, some miles north of Paris,
where they continued their enterprise. After
this they move to Huntingdon, where they continued as partners for a few years.
When they discontinued business in Henry County, Col. Woods moved
to his farm on John’s Branch, Carroll Co., where he had a large body of land.
I have heard Col. Woods and my wife speak of the year he moved to
John’s Branch. I think it was 1840 or 1842.
His house was situated on a little bluff, that ran to the branch.
At the foot of the bluff was a fine spring, not more than a stone’s
cast from the north end of the house. I
was always charmed with the location.
We boarded for several months after marrying, with C.
S. Wood, of Huntingdon, before we went to housekeeping.
(He was not related to my father-in-law.)
David Bell married Mary Dinwiddie,
daughter of my wife’s grandfather, by his second wife.
We kept house together the first year after marriage.
I
and my wife had the following children: Silas B., born July 26th,
1851; Nannie J., born April 3rd, 1854; LeGrand W., born May 31st,
1856; Lizzie H., born February 18th, 1859; Paul, born January 31st,
1861; Clopton, born March 7th, 1864; Georgie Mai, born October 18th,
1868, and Doddridge, born September 18th, 1870.
The last of June and the first of July, 1851, I had
to attend my river courts, and I hesitated very much about leaving home.
I talked to Dr. Wright; told him that I hated to leave home; That
I expected my wife would be confined within a month.
He told me to go on to my courts and be cheerful about it.
He had no idea my wife would need me before I got back.
I talked to Cass; told her that I did not like to leave at such a time.
She told me to attend my courts; she felt no uneasiness at my leaving.
I told her that Dr. Wright promised me that every attention should
be paid her, if needed during my absence, and that a messenger would be sent for
me should it be necessary. I went
to my courts, but was uneasy and unhappy all the time. I got two weeks or more before her confinement.
It was a great relief to me to find I was home on time.
Neither my wife nor I had any relations living in Huntingdon, save David Bell
and his wife. Mary was a little
younger than my wife. Being so much
of my time away from home, it would have been great relief to me had either us
any older relative living in the place. I
often felt the want of this.
In the spring of 1853 our nurse took the measles.
We could never account for the manner in which she took them, unless from
some person passing on the street. I
was compelled to attend Supreme Court at Jackson.
The nurse was recovering when I started.
I saw Dr. Wright, and he promised to watch my family.
He thought that neither Silas nor his mother could take them and get very
bad off before I could get back. I
went by mother’s, and she promised to go up and stay a few days, or until my
return. I got through my business
at Jackson and late Saturday night I reached Col. Woods’, on my way
home. Sunday morning after
breakfast my horse was brought around. The
colonel insisted that I should spend the day, or stay until evening with them.
My answer was: “If I would spend the day with you, under the
circumstances, you ought to loose all respect for me, and I would certainly lose
my own self-respect.” I reached
home about noon. The nurse had
gotten about well. Silas had taken
the measles after I left, and was about well; and his mother had taken them a
day or two before my return. Dr. Wright
came up in the evening. He said my
wife was doing well enough, but thought it best from her symptoms to bleed her.
Cass never had much fancy for having any one cutting about her and so she
would not consent to be bled. The
next morning Dr. Wright still insisted that she needed blood-letting.
He said that while there was nothing serious in her case, he was
satisfied that the best course was to bleed her. I told the doctor to get out his lancet.
I dropped off my coat and shoes and slipped into bed behind her, and said
to her, “Now Cass, lay yourself upon my bosom and shut your eyes: this is
about the best place you will ever find to die.”
The doctor bled her, and she was up and about in a few days.
In the fall of 1863 I left my home in Huntingdon and
moved to my plantation lying on the railroad, three or four miles north of
Trezevant. I stayed in Huntingdon
about as long as I well could. It
was difficult to keep family supplies. I
frequently had Federal soldiers to feed. Some
of these I found to honest, good men, and some the reverse.
I was never troubled with soldiers on my plantation.
My land, Brother Silas’ and Brother Moses’
joined. Our houses were but a short
distance apart. But for the
troubles of the war, the two years I lived on my farm have been among the most
pleasant of my life. When the war
ended I was very much embarrassed as to what I should do.
I felt very much broken up as to my future plans.
I hesitated as to what step I should take.
Should I remain upon my plantation, or buy a small place near Trezevant,
and there educate my children, and in this way start them off in life? Or should
I go to the law? Finally, as the
way opened up, I determined to return to the practice of my profession.
I thought of locating in Jackson, Memphis or Trenton.
There were some reasons why I preferred Jackson.
It was more convenient to my river courts; but there were objections that
overbalanced this. I thought I
could perhaps make more money in Memphis for a time, but then the thought of
bringing up my family in a city, especially if my boys should not be grown and
settled in their habits and in business when I should be taken from them, was
repulsive to me. I never had much
fancy for city life any way. After
weighing the subject as well as I could, I decided in favor of Trenton.
I first bought a place in town from Esq. William Kelton.
I preferred, however, a country home, reasonably convenient to my office,
when I bought of Kelton. After
buying of Kelton, James A. McDearmon proposed selling, and I
bought his place on the Eaton Road, one and one-half miles west of Trenton.
I did not want to bring up my boys in town.
I had seen so many town boys run the road to ruin, that I feared the
result. I would necessarily be much
of my time from home and the children would in a great measure be left entirely
under control of their mother. I
always had a fondness for plantation life, and in my earlier married days I
looked forward with pleasure to the time when I could petty well give up the
law, and settle down with my wife and children in some pleasant country home.
In the last days of December, 1865, I moved to the
place mentioned, bought of McDearmon.
The older children will remember something of the time we had on the
road, the first day. It commenced
raining soon after we started in the morning, and rained heavily until nearly
night. It was a gloomy day, and my
feelings were very much in harmony with the day. The bridges on the leading roads were down, and we had to
take a circuitous route, leaving old Shady Grove and Milan to the right.
Rutherford’s Fork had become almost impassable from the heavy rains,
before we reached it. The bottom
for several hundred yards was covered with water.
I hesitated about attempting to cross.
My family was in a small two-horse wagon, drawn by two old mules.
I ordered the boy who was driving to hold up. The water looked so threatening that I should have turned
back; but there was no house within a mile or two at which we could spend the
night, and the roads had also become almost impassable. I was on horse back. I
knew but little of the road bottom, but concluded that I would ride through the
water and see if the wagon with my family could go safely over.
I endeavored to go through and keep in the road from the marks on the
trees. I had gone about half the
distance to the bridge, I suppose, when I met a young Mr. Robertson
crossing from the opposite side, driving a team of four large, fine mules.
The wagon and team belonged to J. M. Coulter.
Robertson knew me. I
had known his father for many years. I
asked him what the chances were for getting safely across.
He said if I knew the route well I could make it; but if not, it would be
attended with some hazard—that I might get my family swamped in some of the
sloughs. He was acquainted with the
way, and proposed to drive over and take my family across, and let my wagon
follow his. When we got across he
took out his two lead mules, and left them with a young man who was with him.
I put my family in his wagon, and we all got safely through the water.
I think he made no charge; but I paid him two dollars, or two dollars and
fifty cents – do not recollect which. I
never paid any money more cheerfully in my life.
I stayed that night with Major Bryant, of whom I have already
spoken. He entertained us most
hospitably. I have always felt that
there was something providential in my meeting young Robertson just at
the time and place I did. It was at
a time and place I least expected meeting any one.
Had I not met him I might attempted passing through the water with my
family, and might have met with some accident.
Should my sons Silas and LeGrand read these lines, they will understand
something they did not and could not well have understood twenty years ago.
When I reached the end of my journey, the second
night, after dark, with my wife and children all safe, I felt decidedly
relieved. Having to change my home
in the broken-up and unsettled state of the country, made this ratter a dark
period for me; but after settling down in our new home, hope came back to me,
and I said to my wife: “Cass, my heart has returned to me.
Do your best management with our domestic matters, and I will put in all
my strength at law.” My wife always knew how to clothe her family with but little
expense; and for several years we both determined to visit the stores as seldom
as possible. I recollect my wife
wore a mixed dress, after we came to Trenton, that she had made at Valley Farm.
She always looked handsome to me in that dress.
I also wore my jeans for a year or two after we came to Trenton.
I heard many persons say, before and after the
commencement of the war, that they wanted it put off in their day; they did not
want it to come on in their day. I
always felt and said, if it had to come and was an event in the near future, let
it come on in my day, let it fall upon me, and not upon my children.
This is the way I felt, and this is what I always said, from the
beginning to the end of the war; and I am now glad that its sorrows and troubles
fell upon me, rather than upon my children.
During the last years of the war, dry goods became
very scarce, especially cotton goods. They
were exceedingly high. I think I
paid eighty cents to a dollar a yard for calico, the last year of the war.
After we went to Valley Farm, my wife brought the
spinning-wheel and loom into use. She
was spinning one day, and I said to her: “ wife, how handsome and graceful you
look at the spinning-wheel!” She
said there was not so much grace and beauty about it: that it was the idea of
her being at work that was so pleasing to me.
A day or two after this I was reading Kame’s Elements of Criticism, and
came across what he said about there being something pleasing to the eye and
mind in motion and force applied to the industrial pursuits of life; that “the
Creator in his goodness to us had so ordered it; otherwise labor would be
repulsive, and we would turn from it in disgust.” I read to her what he said on this subject, and remarked:
“If you will not agree wit me, Lord Kame does.”
I never knew a more conscientious person than my
wife. There was no deception, no
guile in her composition. Some time
before we were married, I was talking with her on the subject, when she said to
me: “I am at times troubled with a sudden weakness that passes over me.
Did you not see me sit down on the floor a few minutes while
straightening up the parlor this morning? A
weak feeling passed over me, and I had to sit down.
I could not marry a man without telling him of it.”
Her manner of telling me, and the fact that a girl could do so under the
circumstances, made a singular impression on my mind.
This nervous weakness troubled her for a year or two after we were
married, and then for many years she was hardly ever troubled with it.
My wife professed religion when she was quite a girl;
and for a time, as she told me, her hope was bright and she enjoyed religion.
She did not join the church for some time after making a profession.
For much of her time she lived a doubting Christian, She thought if she
had joined the church earlier she would never have been troubled with so many
doubts. As to her own merits, she
was always clothed with the garment of humility.
For several years before her death we seldom, if ever, passed a day
together without conversing upon the subject of religion.
I always tried to encourage and comfort her, and hold her head above the
waves. I would point her to the
promises of the Bible. She was well
read in Scriptures, and was greatly inclined not to take the promises to
herself. “They are for others,
not for me, she would say. I
recollect one day she was talking to me in a desponding way, and I said to her,
“Cass, would you take the reins out of the hands of your Heavenly Father?”
Her quick reply was, “No! no!” I
used to tell her that, had she been in the place of the Christian pilgrim
mentioned in the song, when Polly on told him his captain had gone before and he
would see his face no more, she would, I supposed, have agreed with him, and
would have given up the journey. She
was very fond of Pilgrim’s Progress, and said she was very much like Bunyan.
Mr. Little Faith was an interesting character to her. His faith, though little and feeble, was still faith, she
would say. My wife at all times
felt great solicitude for the salvation of our children.
For years before her death, this desire would at times be intense.
Her heart was burdened for their salvation.
She would ask me to pray for them – “Pray for them with all your
heart! Pray for them like Brother
Silas used to pray for you!” I
would try to comfort her about our children, and refer to the fact that Silas
and some others had professed. I
often said to her at such times, “Mamma, I have a goodly hope that the Lord in
his mercy will in some way bring all our children into his fold.
Try to be hopeful; don’t be desponding.”
In the winter before her death, she became concerned
about Lizzie. It was painful to see
the intensity of her feelings. She
pleaded with me to pray for her. More
than once she said to me: “Mr. Jones, I don’t feel like I can wait – no
time to wait for protracted or revival meetings!”
In short time Brother Montgomery came along.
He was at our house. He had
several conversations with Lizzie. Soon
after he left, Lizzie made an open profession of religion.
In speaking of the fact of her deep concern about Lizzie, I said to her:
“Mamma, how can you have such doubts about your acceptance, when in answer to
your prayers the Lord has converted our daughter, and that at a time when we so
little expected it? You felt you could
not wait. She was the burden of
your heart; and here in the winter there comes along a stranger, and our
daughter is converted. Pluck up your heart, and never again give way to
despondency. Never again become a
prisoner in Doubting Castle.” I
felt that Lizzie was converted in answer to the prayers of her mother. Our children are now all converted, except Doddridge, and I
have a goodly hope that the Lord in his mercy will sanctify some means to his
salvation.* (*Since the above was
written, Doddridge has professed religion and has been baptized.
The Lord be praised!)
I do not know a day has passed over my head since I
had children that I did not pray for them.
I believe in Prayer. The
first night we spent at our boarding-house, after we were married, I said to
Cass: “It has been my intention when I married to hold family parayer.”
It pleased her. We read a chapter and knelt together in prayer.
My wife, without possessing the strongest
constitution, was rarely in bed from illness.
I was twelve or thirteen years her senior, and in the course of nature I
thought of nothing but her surviving me. But
she always said otherwise. She
never expected to live to be old.
Up to within eight or ten months of her death, her
health had for several years been very good.
I felt she would probably live to be old. She had a chill in September, 1877. None of the other children were about the house.
I was scarcely able to wait on her.
Her nervous system seemed to give way under the effects of the chill.
Several times she asked me if she was dying. I
told her she was not, and bore up as cheerfully as I could in my feeble
condition. I sent for Dr. Levy
immediately when her chill came on: but before he arrived the effects had pretty
well passed off. After this I felt
a good deal of solicitude about her health, and watched her with no little
anxiety. I talked with Dr. Levy
privately, and told him the way the chill affected her made me feel serious.
The next day she was up and about; and while there was no apparent reason
why I should feel any particular anxiety about her condition, yet I could not
help feeling so. I requested Dr. Levy
to keep her on the best course of tonics; which he did.
I thought she needed tonic treatment.
I could see, for a year or two before her death, that time had made some
little impression upon her. She did
not appear quite as young as in former years.
Not long after Lizzie professed religion, my wife in conversation said to
me one day: “I feel like my life work is accomplished.”
I passed off the remark in some light manner, but it saddened me.
I could not help feeling sad at the remark.
For three consecutive Sundays before my wife’s
death, she attended church and seemed to enjoy the sermons more than usual, and
appeared quite cheerful. Brother Hillsman
was our pastor. On one of these
occasions – I think it was the last Sunday – the subject was, “We all have
our burdens to bear.” She spoke
of the sermon, and seemed more than usually cheerful in speaking of it.
In the evening, after returning from church, she had a slight chill, or
chilly sensation. She took, the
next morning, what quinine we thought necessary to guard against its return.
While her health had remained reasonably good during the winter and
spring, she occasionally, and but occasionally, was troubled with coldish
depressing spells. It was thought
best to give much quinine at such times, but in connection with small portions
of quinine to give stimulants and tonics.
Monday morning she got up as usual, dressed and
cooked a young chicken, and sent it to Nannie by the children as they went to
school. Nannie was a little unwell.
In the evening my wife had another chill, but nothing serious about it.
I did not, however, like its return.
That night and the next morning I increased the quantity of quinine.
Tuesday evening she had another slight chill.
Wednesday morning I remarked to her, “I believe I will send for the
doctor.” She answered no, “No,
you will not send for the doctor for me: I need no doctor.”
I had given her during the morning four quinine pills, containing from
two to two and one-half grains of quinine each.
She seemed doing very well, and was entirely cheerful.
A little before twelve o’clock I wanted her to take another pill.
She felt so well that she smiled and said, “I don’t think I need it,
but I will take it, for should I not do so, and have a chill, you will think if
I had taken it, I would not be have had the chill.”
I really did not think she needed the last pill, but wanted her to be on
the safe side. I suggested to her
to remain in bed Tuesday and Wednesday, which she did.
She kept her Testament (the one Mr. Landis had given her) in bed with
her, and would read from time to time.
In a short time after taking the pill, the chill came
on her again, more severe in form. I
at once felt alarmed, though I kept my fears to myself.
I sent for Dr. Happel. He
was not long in getting out. Her
symptoms during the evening increased my fears.
Towards night the doctor proposed going home, and spoke of returning in
the morning if I thought it necessary. I
told him if he went home he must return that night, which he did.
Her stomach seemed a good deal irritated. She frequently made efforts to vomit. Thursday morning Dr. Happel went back to town, and
returned in an hour or two and when he went back about the middle of the day, I
told him, while I had every confidence in his treatment, to bring Dr. Levy
with him in the evening. Dr. Levy
came out with him. I told Cass, as
the doctors were coming to the house, that I had directed Happel to bring
Levy with him. She spoke of it as
being entirely unnecessary. I
remarked that I supposed she was correct, but it was a little matter, and I
thought I might be indulged in it. When
the doctors came in the room, I spoke of what I had said to my wife, and her
reply; that I said to her I proposed to pay the bills, and thought I might be
permitted to have my own way, if it was any pleasure to her.
She seemed cheerful, and I think smiled at my remark.
The irritation about the stomach increased, if anything, attended with a
good deal of thirst and a burning sensation.
I procured ice for her; perhaps it was Friday before I got the ice.
She had no chill after Wednesday. Thursday
I told the doctors I felt very serious about my wife, and that one or the other
must remain with her continually. They
did also. I felt that she would not
recover. My heart sank within me.
I suggested to the doctors that evening that I would send for Silas, but
they said it was entirely unnecessary. They
may have so answered to quiet my fears. Friday
morning I had Silas dispatched for. He
reached home on Saturday a little after noon.
His mother recognized him and put her arms around his neck.
In a few hours after his arrival she became unconscious; indeed, the
quinine she had taken made her almost entirely deaf.
I was saying something to her, and she told me she was so deaf she could
not understand me. In my shattered
nervous condition, I could not stay in the room and wait on her all the time as
I wished. It was physically
impossible. How painful it was not
to be able to remain at her side and be with her to the end.
She died Sunday morning, May 13th, 1878, about three
o’clock. Drs. Happle and
Levy did everything that could be done, as I thought. The first three chills (or chilly sensations, for they could
hardly be called chills,) were very slight.
There was nothing in them, considered in themselves, to excite alarm.
After the recurrence of the chill on Wednesday, I thought had I given her
larger quantities of quinine from the first, combined with iron and nux vomica,
it might have stimulated and toned up her system and saved her life.
I have often thought this; but perhaps we never loose a member of our
family, except in the case of extreme old age, without thinking that, had a
different course been pursued, or something additional done, a different result
would or might have followed.
The longer I have lived, the better have I been
satisfied that I married the right woman. Had I life to go over again, I would
go to the same home and marry the same girl.
We are told by inspired wisdom that a prudent wife is from the Lord; and
if a prudent wife is from the Lord, surely a good mother is from the Lord.
When my wife was no more, a feeling of inexpressible
loneliness possessed me. There
seemed to be a void within and about me. We
may be in the busy, bustling world; we may even be surrounded by friends, and
yet we may truly be alone. We may
at such times feel that the hand of desolation is upon us.
It was hard for me to realize that my wife was no more.
For months after her death, whenever I rode out from home and would be
returning, I had a strange feeling that she would meet me on reaching the house. This was, I suppose, from long association.
I would be willing, under the blessing of Heaven, to go over my married
life again. With my present
experience I think I could in some respects better it; but it would in the main
have to be about what it was. I
would not be willing to undertake to raise my children again.
Not that I would so much shrink from the labor and care of raising a
family; but the responsibility is so great, the task so delicate, that I fear
that my errors in this respect might be greater and more numerous that they
were.
The law of love should be the rule of the household.
We should learn to forbear with each other, and to bear one another’s
burdens. We should always remember that others have their burdens as
well as we. It is the commonplace
duties of life, with its ever-recurring petty trials, that we need to be
watchful. It is to meet these
cheerfully and courageously that we especially need grace from God.
Few mothers possess the happy talent of governing and
training children so well as did my wife. With
her it seemed to be a natural gift, rather than an acquired art.
If our children prove to be worthy men and women to the end, it will, I
am sure, be mainly due to their early maternal training.
I was much of the time from home, and the governing and training of our
children devolved largely upon their mother.
My wife was a very strict observer of the Sabbath.
I always thought I was strict enough,; but she kept a little in advanced
of me in this respect. I thought
she stood so straight that she leant back a little.
I more than once reminded her of the boy who, as a means of encouraging
him to be good, respect the Sabbath and reach the better land, was told always
Sunday there, and who answered, “I don’t want to go where it is always
Sunday!” I reckon the little
fellow thought he had had enough of Sunday in this world.
In speaking of my life, it will be seen that I have
occasionally used the word “Mamma.” In
my later days, when none but the family were present, I frequently chimed in
with the children and called her “Mamma.”
She called me to account for this one day; but I insisted that it was an
affectionate way of addressing her in the home circle.
I said, “I never indulge in this way of addressing you, except when
none are present but the children.” After
this she never complained at my thus addressing her.
She also in our later years frequently called me “Papa.”
My wife
was a little over medium size; not so tall as her sister Mary, or Georgie.
Nannie’s face resembles her mother’s more than any of her daughters.
Her profile, a little turned from you, has a think has a striking
likeness to her mother’s. Of the
boy’s I think Silas’ features most like his mother’s.
I have already stated that my wife was eminently conscientious.
She was by nature. She was brought up by Christian parents, around whose hearth
the domestic virtues were cultivated and had their abode. She knew nothing of dissimulation, and was a stranger to
artifice and affectation. Good
sense was the predominant of her character, and its controlling element.
She was eminently discreet and well balanced.
The conscientious discharge of all the duties of domestic life was with
her an absorbing consideration.
SILAS P. JONES.
-- Brother Silas married Miss Jane Gallion on Oct. 13th, 1841.
He died August 21st, 1876.
He was set apart by the Baptist church at McLemoresville to work the
Gospel ministry when he was a little over thirty years of age.
Elder J. M. Hurt and Dr. J. R. Graves constituted the
presbytery that ordained him to his work. He
was a man of fine personal appearance, being a little over six feet high and
well proportioned. He and his
brother Isaac resemble each other very much.
He was not a metaphysician; he never dealt in abstractions or subtleties
of doctrine. He was of thorough
good sense, plain and practical. He
possessed a warm heart, active sympathies, a generous and noble nature. He was frank and cordial, highly companionable, and was
always hopeful and cheerful. There
was a good deal of magnetism in his composition.
I always felt strengthened by being with him.
He entered readily into the feelings and sympathies of those around him,
and knew how to say a kind and sympathizing word to the afflicted or distressed.
He possessed strong convictions, and was true to his convictions.
His education was confined to the ordinary English branches, such as were
taught in the schools of the country in his days.
He was raised on the plantation; his life had been given exclusively to
the business of the farm. He had
never been in public life when he began preaching, and was entirely unaccustomed
to public speaking. I was not a
little satisfied, however, that he entered upon this course only from a sense of
duty. I believe in a special call
to the ministry; and believing this, I believed that the Lord would sustain him
and make him useful. His labors
were blessed, and he was in the hands of the Lord the means of turning many to
righteousness. If ever I reach the
heavenly land, of which I have an humble hope, I feel that, under God, he was
the means of leading me in the good and right way.
Save my mother, my own wife and children, there was no one on earth that
I felt so near and dear to me. He
received but little for preaching. Not
long after the war, he told me that with the exception of one or two years, he
had given away about as much as had ever been given him for his ministry labors.
I had it in my power to be helpful to him in some respects; and that I
had the ability, and the will to use it, has always afforded me the sincerest
satisfaction. He told me, after he
had been preaching some years, that when he first commenced praying in public it
always embarrassed him, until he was called upon one day to pray at a
camp-meeting held near Shady Grove. This
was before he began preaching. While
praying, the presence and love of God became so manifested to him that he began
shouting and praising God. “If
the assembled universe had been present.” He said to me, “I would have
praised God my Savior.” He was
willing for all to be present, men and angels.
After this he never felt any embarrassment in praying in public.
I felt that this manifestation of God’s presence and love was granted
him for the purpose of strengthening his faith and removing from him the fear of
man. My answer to him was: “You
will perhaps while on earth never again have such a wonderful manifestation of
the divine love and approbation.”
These wonderful visitations of the presence and glory
of God are not often met with in the life of the same individual.
We have just so much grace and divine help given us as to enable us to
discharge the duties that God requires at our hands, and no more, and none to
spare. It was so under the Old
Testament dispensation; it is so under the New.
My brother, as stated, died on 21st day of
August, 1876. He wrote me some time
in February that he was seriously ill. I
went to see him, and remained with him, as I remember, two nights and a day.
I was to see him several times, until my own health gave way in June.
The second time I went to see him, which was in March, he feared that he
had cancer of the stomach. My fears
were also alarmed, but I was reluctant to believe such was the case.
But in the end no room was left for doubt.
I went to see him in April. He
was not yet fully satisfied as to the nature of his malady, but still apprehend
he had cancer of the stomach. He
asked me what I thought of his condition, did I think he would recover.
I said to him that I could not think he would not recover; that a severe
case of dyspepsia would account for his symptoms.
He told me he did not fear death; and he at this time was not, I am sure,
satisfied that he would not be restored to health again.
For about two months before his death I did not see him.
I was confined most of that time closely to my bed.
For many years before his death, to be useful and to be good seemed to be
the ruling.
My brother left the following children: LeGrand M.,
born August 1st, 1850; Mary C., born June 25th, 1847, who
married Dr. Wingo; Bettie G., born June 25th, 1857, who
married a Mr. Askew; (they are all living in the neighborhood of
Trezevant;) Archer , born September 25, 1853, and died October 4th,
1873. His eldest son, James M., was
born October 1st, 1843. He
enlisted in the Confederate service; was in the battle fought opposite Columbus,
KY., and escaped unhurt. He was
mortally wounded in the battle of Shilo on Sunday.
Brother Isaac brought him home. I
was to see him several times after he was brought home and before he died, and
stayed with him much of the time. When
I first saw him I had some hope he would recover from his wounds.
He was struck by a mini ball, a little below the region of the stomach,
the ball coming out near the spinal column, which was not injured.
He complained of no pain. He
died April 19th, 1862.
ELDER J. M. HURT.
-- I cannot close this little family sketch without saying a few words about
Elder J. M. Hurt. He and my
father’s family were acquainted in Virginia.
I knew him from the time we came to Tennessee until his death.
After my father’s death he manifested a good deal of interest in our
family. He always treated me with
marked kindness and respect. I and
my brother Silas appreciated him through life with little less than filial
regard. He felt great interest in
Silas as a young preacher, and was to him as a father in the ministry.
I had many evidence of the warm interest he felt in my welfare.
He was a great benefit to me, not only in my earlier years, but indeed
through life. Left pretty much
alone, with no special friend to counsel or guide me, I appreciated more
sensibly the interest he manifested in me and my father’s family.
Whenever I could, I sought his company, and loved to be with him,
I joined the Baptist church at McLemoresville while
Elder Hurt was pastor, and he baptized me. He was a well informed man; and while there where men of more
learning and higher culture, I have always thought he was one of the most
intellectual men I ever knew. He
was by nature a great man, and an original thinker, and was inclined to exhaust
any subject in which he became interested.
He was not what you would call a polished man; There was something of the
rough-hewn about his character. When
a young man he read Blackstone’s Commentaries, as I learned from him after I
became a lawyer, and at one time thought of adopting the Law as a profession.
Had he done so, he would have taken the first rank in his profession.
He was a man of clear conception, strong convictions , and unswerving
integrity. He must have been
somewhat advanced in life before he became a preacher of the Gospel.
My father had been in Tennessee several years before I heard of Elder Hurt’s
preaching. He had, as I understood,
been ordained to the ministry several years before I heard him.
When called out by an important occasion he generally preached a great
sermon. Our old-fashioned
camp-meetings suited him. Upon such
occasions he came nearer John Kerr than any man I ever heard. I once heard him at the old camp-meeting ground near Shady
Grove, preach with such powerful effect from the text, “There is a friend that
sticketh closer than a brother.” I
may judge partially of many of our old men in the ministry.
Men of the present day, turned out from our schools, may have more
learning, greater knowledge of books, and higher culture; but I am slow to
believe that we have that grand class of men that belonged to the pass
generation. It seems to me that men
of the present day are less spiritually minded, and rely more on the knowledge
of books than men of the past. I by no means depreciate learning; but may not the too eager
pursuit of the mere learning to be acquire from books chill the spiritual man,
cause the student to rely too much upon his learning, and leave undeveloped the
natural powers, powers which must always be developed to make a truly great man.
ELDER GEORGE HARRIS
was a Presiding Elder in the Methodist Church when I first knew him.
I rode out from Huntingdon with him one morning, six or eight miles on
the Trenton road. He was on his way
home, and I was riding out to my mother’s. This was before I was married, and
was the beginning of my acquaintance with him.
I found him to be very companionable and interesting.
My older children will recollect him well.
Elder Harris was not a graduate of any of the
schools; his educational advantages in early life were rather limited; he was
self-educated. He may be said to
have been a student through life; was well read, and possessed a large share of
valuable information. He was very
much of an independent and original thinker.
His natural gifts were of a high order.
He was eminently practical, and was a man of fine executive ability.
He was resolute and intrepid, clear-headed and broad-minded; possessed a
strong will, and was a man of inflexible integrity.
He was fitted by nature to be a leader among men.
In person he was plain, simple and unostentatious.
There was no affection, no dissimulation about him; nothing narrow or
little entered into his character. He
possessed a large share of those qualities of head and heart that command
admiration and esteem. He was frank
and cordial, and had many warm and devoted friends; and those who differed from
him were compelled to respect him.
His long life was well usefully spent; and, he has
left his impress upon the people among whom for many years he lived and labored.
He was a zealous and indefatigable preacher in the early history of West
Tennessee. His labors in the cause
of the Gospel were greatly blessed; many professed religion under his ministry,
and he was the means of turning many to righteousness.
He exercised more influence in building up his denomination in West
Tennessee than any other single individual.
He was no ordinary preacher; and when his powers were called upon some
important occasion, generally preached a grand sermon.
I know of no preacher in his church in West Tennessee that equaled him in
the pulpit; nor can I say that I know of any in the other denominations that
excelled him. There were in his
later days those of his church that were more scholarly; but, as I have said of
J. M. Hurt, I say of Elder Harris, the schools do not often turn
out just such men as either of them. Their
broad, manly common sense, their knowledge of the heart and the means of
reaching the heart, is something more than the schools, or mere scholastic
training, can give. Harris knew the
character of the people among whom he lived and labored, knew their spiritual
wants, and knew how to adapt himself to them.
I had not been in Trenton long, before he one day stepped into my office.
When he was about leaving I requested never to miss an opportunity of
spending a night with me, when he could do so.
He was a fine conversationalist, and I was very fond of hearing him talk,
especially of history of his early days. He
knew much of the early history of Tennessee; knew something personally of the
later years of the great Cumberland Revival, and was well acquainted with
numbers who had passed through it. These
were interesting subjects to me, and he was always ready to engage in
conversation on them. Out of this
great revival the Cumberland Presbyterian Church sprang up.
There was a good deal of the pioneer in his
composition. He was fond of his
rifle, and of hunting deer and bear. Some
of his adventures were highly exciting. His
cool daring at times was surprising. I will give one incident, as it illustrates his character and
may interest my grandchildren. Not
long after he came to Henry County, while he was out on the farm, he one day
heard a hog put up a fearful squealing, not far distant from the field in which
he was working. From the terrible
outcry of the hog, he was satisfied that a bear caught him. He had his rifle with him; it was loaded and in good
condition. He always kept his rifle
in good order for any emergency. Rifle
in hand, he started in the direction of the noise. The cane and undergrowth in the woods was thick; to avoid
these, and to be as silent as possible, he took to the bed of a dry branch, that
led in the direction in which he heard the hog.
The squealing of the hog became fainter and fainter.
As he approached near, he crept softly along the bed of the branch; and
coming to where the branch made a sudden turn, he saw the bear on the hog, not
many feet in front of him; my recollection is, not more than two or three
lengths of his rifle. Harris
was in a stooping posture. He and the bear saw each other about the same time.
The bear threw himself back upon his haunches.
Instantly Harris had his rifle leveled upon him, took aim and
fired. The bear sprang forward, ran over him, knocked off his hat,
and went on his way. Harris
reloaded, followed the trail of the bear, by the blood, and in a few hundred
yards came upon him, and found him dead, he having given him a mortal shot.
I do not think Daniel Boone or any other border man ever displayed cooler
nerve than Harris did upon this condition.
CHARLES JONES,
Colored. – When the war ended, many of the colored people got new houses. Family ties were severed, Charles, the colored man of whom I
have spoken in connection with the wonderful meteoric display, moved to Gibson
to be with his wife. In passing to
and from Carroll I had at different times seen most of the old family servants,
and Charles. I had not seen him for
several years after the war. One
day he stepped into my office at Trenton. I
was alone. We had a long talk.
Charles was undoubtedly affected, and I was too.
He spoke of his “mistiss,” my mother; of the fact that she had raised
him from a child, and of his regret that he had not seen her in her last
illness. He had not heard of her
sickness until after her death. When
he was about leaving he said: “Mass LeGrand, I must hug you before I leave.”
And so he did. After this, Charles
came frequently to see us, until his death, which was in February, 1886; and at
such times he generally received some substantial evidence of the esteem in
which he was held by the family. He
used to make bread-trays for sale in ante-bellum days.
Not long after he first came to see me, after I moved to Trenton, I told
him he must make me a tray. He did
so. My recollection is I paid him
double the price put on it. It was
made of tupelo gum. I now have it.
I want it preserved in the family as an heirloom.
Charles was one of the best men I ever knew.
When he died, I don’t think he left a better man behind him, white or
colored. For many years before the
war he held prayers at night. He
generally became interested at such times, and everybody on the place could hear
him pray. Mother felt especially
interested in hearing him. I
frequently heard her speak of what a comfort it was to her to hear him pray.
I never saw a man walk nearer and lived more in communion with God.
CHARLES CLARK,
Colored. – I had for six or seven years before the war owned a colored man
named Charles Clark. I
bought him at his own request. He
called on me at my office one day, with a note from his master saying he would
sell him. I told him to go see my
wife, and if she could agree it would be all right on my part.
My wife wanted me to buy him, stating as her reason, that with Charles on
hand she could always feel easy in my absence.
He was at the time about fifty years old.
He was one of the most reliable men I ever knew.
I never felt uneasy with anything in his hands; knew it would come ip
right.
After the Federal soldiers came into the country,
some of the colored people went off with them; but few of them, however, from
our part of the State. One day I
said to Charles; “If you want to leave me, I don’t want you to slip off;
there is no necessity for this; but pack up and come and tell us farewell.
I have something left yet, and I will give you some money to help you
until you find employment.” Charles
said he had no idea of leaving me; that they (meaning the Federals) would not
get him off, unless they tied him and took him by force.
In the fall of 1863 I moved to the plantation, lying on the railroad,
three or four miles north of Trezevant. Charles
was left in charge of my old home. When
the war ended I gave him a home for one year free of charge.
Two or three years after the close of the war he came to see me, and
wanted to live with me, saying he would rather live with me than anybody else.
We were glad to see him, no doubt of this.
He stayed with us a day or two, and made his arrangements to live with
me; but before the end of the year one of his wife’s daughters died, as I
learned from him, and caused such a change in the family that he could not come.
This was the last time I saw Charles. He died a few years after this.
I did not know he had been sick until I heard of his death, and the news
of his departure saddened me.
I had a colored woman who died during the war.
My father-in-law gave her to my wife soon after we were married.
Her hand was in mine when she breathed her last.
I have never heard anyone say, since the war, that
they would have African slavery restored in the Southern States.
I am glad its responsibility no longer rests on me, or is to rest on my
children. Not that I think slavery
is a sin. Abraham, called a friend
of God, was a slaveholder. The
Mosaic law recognized slavery. Slavery
existed in the days of Christ and his Apostles.
The duties of both master and servants are taught in the New Testament.
Paul restored Onesimus, after he was converted, to his master.
In the Southern States, in ante-bellum days, the
colored people were better cared for than any purely laboring population of
which I have any knowledge. They
performed but moderate labor, and were free from the weightier cares that
developed upon their masters; they were taken care of in sickness and provided
for in old age. But when I say
this, I frankly confess there were things connected with slavery with which I
was never satisfied.
I would not be misunderstood from what I have just
said. I believe in doctrine of
State sovereignty. The Constitution
of the United States was made by the States, as separate, distinct political
communities, each state acting for itself.
This the history of the Constitution abundantly established: and by its
terms it is binding between the States ratifying the same.
The Federal Government, under the Constitution, is one of delegated
powers; its powers are limited, and it can rightfully exercise no powers save
those that are delegated. This is
so upon principle, and needs to no declaration to that effect.
But it is, out of abundant caution, so declared in the tenth article of
the Amendments to the Constitution. All
the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, up to 1860, not only
recognize but declare these doctrines. Entertaining
these opinions, my allegiance went with my State when she withdrew from the
Federal Union.
A. TSIN.
– My children may at some future day wish to know how I came interested in the
little Chinese girl, A. Tsin.
The Chinese were inclined, some years ago, to boycott
any of their race that embraced the Christian religion.
This feeling still continues. In
the September number of the Foreign Missionary Journal of 1884 or 1885, as well
as I recollect, there was published a letter from Brother E. Z. Simmons,
one of our missionaries to Canton, China. In
this letter he said he had recently had a hot and muddy walk, and being tired,
had sat down to rest in some shade. While
resting, a Chinese woman came along, bearing a heavy burden.
She had brought this burden a number of miles, for which she would
receive a small pittance, or what in this country would be so regarded.
He stated in his letter that she and her husband had embraced the
Christian religion; that her husband had formerly been a butcher, and that for
renouncing the religion of their country his customers had all left him; and he
had to abandon his business, and was reduced to great straits to make a living.
This woman had in consequence been compelled to take this long and
toilsome walk to make something with which to support life.
Elder Simmons’ walk, he stated, had been light compared with
hers. He thereupon took courage and
went on his way. The story was a
touching one. I felt I wanted this
woman and her husband to know that one human being, though living on the
opposite side of the globe, had heard their story and had been moved by it.
I thereupon sent Brother Simmons five dollars to be given her,
unless he should know some reason for not doing so, my meaning being, unless
they had apostatized, which I suppose he understood.
Several months had passed. I had ceased to think of the little incident, when one day as
I lay on my bed a letter was handed to me from Brother Simmons.
He had received the money, and had given it to the poor woman.
They were thankful indeed. The
same envelope contained a letter from the husband and wife, written in Chinese. I regretted that Brother Simmons had not translated
it. In his letter he told me they
had a little girl they wanted to educate in our Canton schools, but they were to
poor to do so. He told me the sum
required, but did not ask me for any help.
I determined to aid in her education, and have done so. This is the way I became interested in this girl.
I have now (January, 1891,) contributed for five years.
In one year more, I learned from Brother Simmons, her education
will be completed, and she will be qualified to teach.
Two years ago, the coming spring, the little girl professed religion and
was baptized. This account may at
some future day be interesting to my children.
GREAT CHANGES
have taken place in the habits and business methods of the people since I was a
boy. Labor-saving machines without
number have been invented, greatly multiplied, and brought into use in every
department of business. In my
earlier days families did not buy the quantity of dry goods they do now. The spinning wheel and loom were then to be found in every
family. The white women of the
country spun and wove much of the cloth that was used in the family.
During the winter months the negro women on the plantations were employed
in spinning, and some in weaving. When
a boy, I spooled, warped and put in the loom, and through the sley and harness,
and wove many a piece of cloth. I
was sometimes required to do the ironing for the family; but there were some
things I never did: I never washed clothes nor milked a cow.
The wheel for spinning flax was also common.
Spinning flax was a beautiful and rapid work.
My mother was very fond of it, and was a rapid spinner.
All classes were to a large extent clothed with fabrics made at home; and
the household was in this way largely supplied with cotton, woolen and flaxen
goods.
Tan yards were in every neighborhood.
At these the leather was tanned for making shoes, harness, etc.
The people lived well and comfortably, and more at home than now, and
less running about at the present day. My
mother did the sewing for a large white and colored family with the needle. Sewing machines have come into use long since I was grown.
I can recollect when a few old farmers still used the
reap-hook for cutting wheat and oats; but this had been very much abandoned for
the scythe and cradle; and these to a large extent have been supplanted by the
reaper. We then trod our wheat
mainly with horses. Since then this
practice has been entirely abandon for the thresher.
Tobacco and wheat were the leading monied staples in
that part of Virginia where my father lived.
The tobacco was prized in large hogsheads, weighing from 1800 to 2000
pounds. These were carried to
market on wagons. The wagons
usually brought back dry goods or groceries.
Richmond and Farmville were our leading tobacco and wheat markets.
When my father was a young man it was quite common to
roll tobacco to market. I have seen
tobacco taken to market in this way. Felloes
were put around the hogshead near each end, and an axle was fixed to the ends of
the hogshead, to which a frame tongue, or something in the nature of a tongue,
was fixed. A yoke of oxen or two
horses would in this way roll a hogshead very easily.
This way of taking tobacco to market was inclined to damage it, as it
would have to be rolled through the mud, if any, and the little unbridge
streams. Batteaux (boat) were also
used on Stanton and Dan Rivers, and I suppose on other streams in the State, for
carrying heavy produce to market. They
usually carried eight or ten hogsheads at a time.
They were commonly manned by three hands; one a stearman, and two to work
at the poles in going up stream. They
made good speed, with but little labor, in going down stream; but in coming up
stream Batteau had to be poled. This
was hard and laborious work. They
generally had a bugle on board, which some of the hands would occasionally wind.
For many years after my father came to Tennessee the
cotton, tobacco and wheat was generally hauled from the neighborhood of
MvLemoresville to Wills’ Point, or to some other place on the Tennessee River.
Occasionally some would be hauled to Hickman, Kentucky.
My grandchildren will understand there were no railroads in the country
at the time of which I am now speaking. The
telegraph has been invented and brought into use within my recollection.
My health gave way in the summer of 1876, since which
time I have been unable to attend to any active business.
My two younger children have little, if any, recollection when their
father was in active life. They recollect me only as a broken-down man.
I little thought ten or twelve years ago, that I should live to see my
children grown, but I have lived to see my youngest son reach manhood.
And more, they are all Christian men and Christian women.
The Lord has mercifully lengthened out my days. I desire to be thankful. May my children ever walk in the light and in the fear of God. May they never cease to remember that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. May they be useful in their day and generation, and may the blessing of heaven ever rest upon them.